Abstract

Since the eruption of the Covid‐19 pandemic, in response to the global health emergency, governments have focused on designing policies aimed at the development of more innovative products and services. Effective collaboration, communication, and Open Innovation (OI) between government organizations, education and research institutions, and the marketplace have been fundamental to the success of each country's response during the crisis period. Using a comprehensive data set from OECD on innovation policies implemented by governments before and during the Covid‐19 crisis, this paper analyses the extent to which these innovation policies promote OI and how these policy decisions evolve to support an effective response to the pandemic. Through a cluster analysis, we identify four possible government innovation policy strategies (centralizers; conservative OI promoters; collaborative supporters; open collaborators) and analyze how these strategies evolve before and during Covid‐19. Our findings confirm that even though there is an increased use of innovation policies promoting OI during the crisis, there is little evidence of consistency between the policy strategy used pre‐Covid and during the crisis for each country. However, there is an increased use of four types of innovation policy instruments, i.e., those entailing formal consultation with stakeholders and experts; fellowships and postgraduate loans and scholarships; networking and collaborative platforms; and dedicated support to research infrastructures. Although the paper limits the scope of the analysis to the early government reactions in selected OECD countries, it captures an important moment in time (i.e., reaction to a severe shock), which opens avenues for future studies.

Highlights

  • Each quadrant represents a different innovation policy strategy based on the relative use of innovation policies with external organizations and those promoting Open Innovation (OI)

  • 50% of the countries make high use of innovation policies with external organizations (31.8% as collaborative supporters and 18.2% as open collaborators). This percentage decreases to 40% if we look at those countries adopting innovation policies with external organizations promoting OI (22.7% as conservative OI supporters and 18.2% as open collaborators)

  • This research paper examines the characteristics of the government innovation policy strategies for 44 OECD countries during normal times and during Covid-­19 by analyzing the extent to which innovation policies were implemented to promote OI during a global emergency

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The urgency for mitigating the full impact of Covid-1­ 9 by reducing its short and longer-t­erm impacts has driven governments to launch widescale and fast-­tracked innovation policies This move is a complete shift in thinking with previous arguments that public organizations are not sufficiently innovative (Sørensen and Torfing, 2011). The ‘Accelerating Covid-1­ 9 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines’ (ACTIV) initiative involving the US National Institute of Health, the European Medicines Agency, and several biopharmaceutical companies speed up the research and development of effective Covid-1­9 treatments and vaccines Since analyzing these initiatives in detail, in line with Chesbrough (2020), we note that common factors across governments and their innovation policy efforts include openness and collaboration. This leads us to the following research questions: RQ1: To what extent did governments modify the use of existing innovation policies targeting external organizations in response to Covid-­19?

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.