The Impact of BMI on Donor and Recipient Site Morbidity in Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap.
Obesity is a known risk factor for surgical complications, but its impact on mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap (FFF) remains unclear. This study examines the association between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative morbidity. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with FFF from 2000 to 2024. Patients were categorized by BMI: underweight (< 18.5kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30kg/m2). Primary outcomes included donor and recipient site complications; secondary outcomes included physical therapy data. Multivariate models adjusted for age, gender, smoking, comorbidities, and chemotherapy. Among 428 patients, 11.0% were underweight, 44.2% normal weight, 31.3% overweight, and 13.6% obese. Donor site complications occurred in 31%of patients, primarily delayed wound healing. Compared with normal weight patients (33% complication rate), underweight patients had significantly fewer donor site complications (11%, p = 0.020), while rates in overweight (30%, p = 1.0) and obese patients (45%, p = 0.358) did not significantly differ. Underweight status was independently associated with lower odds of donor site complications (OR 0.20, p = 0.002), and higher continuous BMI predicted increased donor site risk (OR 1.08, p = 0.001). BMI was not associated with recipient site complications or rehabilitation outcomes, although underweight patients experienced earlier recipient site complications on time-to-event analysis. Higher BMI was independently associated with increased donor site morbidity, particularly in patients requiring skin graft closure. Underweight patients had fewer donor site complications but experienced earlier recipient site complications, underscoring the need for BMI-tailored perioperative strategies.
2
- 10.21037/abs-21-2
- Dec 1, 2022
- Annals of Breast Surgery
17
- 10.1097/prs.0000000000004845
- Sep 1, 2018
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
169
- 10.1016/s0167-8140(03)00040-9
- Apr 8, 2003
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
216
- 10.1097/prs.0b013e3182402d9a
- Mar 1, 2012
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
304
- 10.1155/2014/638936
- Feb 20, 2014
- ISRN Obesity
- 10.1097/js9.0000000000001972
- Nov 1, 2024
- International journal of surgery (London, England)
161
- 10.1097/prs.0b013e318221dc2a
- Sep 1, 2011
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
18
- 10.5493/wjem.v14.i1.86898
- Mar 20, 2024
- World Journal of Experimental Medicine
82
- 10.1097/mlg.0b013e31816fca5c
- Jul 1, 2008
- The Laryngoscope
11
- 10.1055/s-0042-1759795
- Dec 19, 2022
- Seminars in Plastic Surgery
- Research Article
2
- 10.32412/pjohns.v28i1.509
- Jun 18, 2013
- Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Combination of Autologous Protein-Rich Fibrin and Bone Graft: An Invaluable Option for Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects
- Research Article
17
- 10.1007/s00238-006-0076-8
- Nov 15, 2006
- European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Nowadays the vascularized free fibula flap and the free iliac crest flap are the methods most frequently used to reconstruct the mandible. This is also the case in our clinic. A retrospective nonrandomized study was performed to compare both flaps. The vascularized fibula free flap and the iliac crest free flap were compared in terms of logistics, flap failure, revisionary surgery, donor site morbidity, and recipient site morbidity. No significant differences in flap failure and revision surgery were found between the fibula group and the iliac crest group. Recipient site and donor site complications (major and minor) were significantly less in the fibula group compared to the iliac crest group. In mandibular reconstruction, the free vascularized fibula flap appears to be superior to the free vascularized iliac crest flap in terms of both recipient site and donor site morbidity.
- Research Article
- 10.1186/s13005-024-00470-w
- Oct 30, 2024
- Head & Face Medicine
BackgroundAutologous bone grafts are essential in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery, and depending on the donor site, they can be associated with specific harvesting morbidities. One of the most commonly applied bone grafts is the iliac crest bone graft, irrespective of other grafts, which might be associated with an easier surgical procedure or the possibility of harvesting them under local anaesthesia. Objective of the study is the clinical evaluation of proximal tibia bone grafts regarding their eligibility for maxillofacial bone grafting.MethodsIn this retrospective study, proximal tibia bone grafts were examined with regard to associated donor and recipient site morbidity and their suitability for alveolar ridge augmentation and rhinoplasty.ResultsIn total, 21 tibia grafts were included. Fifty-seven percent of the bone grafts were used for alveolar ridge reconstruction, and 43% were used for augmentative rhinoplasty. No significant complications occurred during or after harvesting, but in 14.3% of the patients, minor wound healing disorders were recorded at the donor site, and in 19% of the patients, they were recorded at the recipient site. Statistically, patient sex, age, nicotine and alcohol abuse and metabolic diseases had no significant influence on the complication rate. Graft harvesting under local anaesthesia and at summer temperatures was associated with significantly more complications at the harvesting site (p < 0.05). In cases of dental implant insertion into augmented sites, the implants (n = 31) were followed up for a median period of 40.5 months, during this time 86.7% of the implants survived.ConclusionThe proximal tibia is a suitable donor site for harvesting autologous bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation or rhinoplasty because the donor site morbidity is low, and in contrast to iliac crest bone grafts, they can be harvested under local anaesthesia, which might be advantageous for outpatient surgeries.
- Research Article
4
- 10.1038/s41598-022-25346-4
- Dec 15, 2022
- Scientific Reports
To investigate if donor and recipient site morbidity (healing time and cosmesis) could be reduced by a novel, modified split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) technique using a dermal component in the STSG procedure (DG). The STSG technique has been used for 150 years in surgery with limited improvements. Its drawbacks are well known and relate to donor site morbidity and recipient site cosmetic shortcomings (especially mesh patterns, wound contracture, and scarring). The Dermal graft technique (DG) has emerged as an interesting alternative, which reduces donor site morbidity, increases graft yield, and has the potential to avoid the mesh procedure in the STSG procedure due to its elastic properties. A prospective, dual-centre, intra-individual controlled comparison study. Twenty-one patients received both an unmeshed dermis graft and a regular 1:1.5 meshed STSG. Aesthetic and scar assessments were done using The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and a Cutometer Dual MPA 580 on both donor and recipient sites. These were also examined histologically for remodelling and scar formation. Dermal graft donor sites and the STSG donor sites healed in 8 and 14 days, respectively (p < 0.005). Patient-reported POSAS showed better values for colour for all three measurements, i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months, and the observers rated both vascularity and pigmentation better on these occasions (p < 0.01). At the recipient site, (n = 21) the mesh patterns were avoided as the DG covered the donor site due to its elastic properties and rendered the meshing procedure unnecessary. Scar formation was seen at the dermal donor and recipient sites after 6 months as in the standard scar healing process. The dermis graft technique, besides potentially rendering a larger graft yield, reduced donor site morbidity, as it healed faster than the standard STSG. Due to its elastic properties, the DG procedure eliminated the meshing requirement (when compared to a 1:1.5 meshed STSG). This promising outcome presented for the DG technique needs to be further explored, especially regarding the elasticity of the dermal graft and its ability to reduce mesh patterns.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT05189743) 12/01/2022.
- Research Article
5
- 10.1016/j.anplas.2021.03.003
- Mar 30, 2021
- Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique
Risk factors assessment in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction
- Research Article
9
- 10.1097/scs.0000000000007397
- Jan 5, 2021
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
The morbidity at the donor-site in the free fibula flap is a well-studied fact in the adult population, but in children, there are few reports of the long-term adverse effects at the donor site. In this study, we evaluate donor-site morbidity, complications, and functional outcome in pediatric patients undergoing free fibula flap harvest for mandibular or maxillary reconstruction, and the relation between pain and walking abilities. A retrospective study of 22 pediatric patients undergoing free fibula flap harvest for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction between 2003 and 2014 was conducted. A certified point evaluation system was used, analyzing several factors like pain, walking ability, restriction in activities, gait alteration, paresthesia, and cosmetic appearance, and the relationship between variables. Mean age follow up of patient was 8.5 years (range 2-13 years). Pain was reported in 27% (n = 6), paresthesia and numbness 9% (n = 2), walking ability alteration in 50% (n = 11), restriction in activities in 18% (n = 4), gait alteration in 23% (n = 5), and cosmetic appearance alteration in the 14% (n = 3). We compare the pain and the gait alteration and did not find any relation between pain and gait alteration (P = 0.6016) and there was no relation between restriction in activities and walking ability (P = 0.1455). Free fibula flap is the gold standard for head and neck reconstruction, but the morbidity at the donor site, especially in a growing child, should not be ignored or minimized when counseling patients and their families.More studies, with more population and with a long-term follow-up should be carried out to determine the impact on the daily activities on the pediatric population.
- Research Article
1
- 10.1177/1943387520980246
- Dec 22, 2020
- Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Free fibula flaps are nowadays the gold standard for the surgical reconstruction on large mandibular defects. Malocclusion is an important complication of this type of reconstruction and many of these patients end up requiring subsequent orthognathic corrective surgery. This is a descriptive retrospective case series study. To describe the demographic data, operative techniques, corrective methods and postoperative results in the management of malocclusion following mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. This case series study included patients who underwent free fibula flap mandibular reconstructions and who that subsequently developed malocclusion requiring orthognathic corrective surgery, from June 2010 to December 2019. Panoramic X-rays, cephalometries and/or 3-D facial reconstruction CT scans were used for surgical planning to create surgical cutting guides, templates and occlusal splints in all the patients that underwent corrective orthognathic surgery. There were 46 patients who underwent a free fibula flap mandibular and maxillary reconstruction at San Jose Hospital between June 2010 and December 2019 of these, 5 patients (10.9%) developed postoperative malocclusion. One case from another institution was added to this study for a total of 6 patients with malocclusion following mandibular reconstruction surgery with a fibula free flap. During the orthognathic surgery, vertical osteotomies were performed in 3 patients and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were necessary in 2 patients and L-shape in 1 patient. Osteogenic distraction was performed in 3 patients as part of their orthognathic treatment. The fixation methods were based in miniplates for 3 of the patients and lag screws for the remaining 3 patients. With this approach, all patients had an adequate occlusion correction with a 100% consolidation at their 6-month follow up. Malocclusion is a significant complication following mandibular reconstruction surgery that must be identified and managed. In severe cases, it requires corrective orthognathic surgery in severe cases. We have developed a protocol to avoid pitfalls during the primary reconstruction and in case an orthognathic surgery is required for malocclusion correction, preoperative planning with cutting guides and occlusal splints should be assessed, to guarantee favorable results through a reproducible technique.
- Research Article
101
- 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.04.013
- Jul 5, 2007
- International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction after mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps
- Research Article
1
- 10.1016/j.joms.2023.08.224
- Sep 4, 2023
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Symmetrical Midfacial Growth After Pediatric Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flap
- Research Article
11
- 10.1002/hed.27235
- Nov 6, 2022
- Head & Neck
Fibula free flaps (FFF) are often considered the first choice for mandibular reconstruction, but scapular system free flaps (SFF) have increased in popularity due to versatility, donor site advantages, and patient factors. Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing mandibulectomy with FFF or SFF reconstruction from 2016 to 2021. Hundred and seventy-six patients (FFF n=145, SFF n=31) underwent the aforementioned procedures. Mean FFF operative time was 9.47 h versus 9.88 for SFF (p=0.40). Two-flap reconstructions required 12.65 h versus 10.09 for SFF with soft tissue (p=0.002). Donor site complications were identified in 65.6% of FFF with skin grafting. These findings suggest that SFF requires similar operative time and results in reduced donor site morbidity as compared to FFF. Supine, concurrent harvesting of SFF allows for single-flap harvest with significantly shorter operative time. SFF could be considered a primary option for mandible reconstruction for complex defects and in select patients.
- Research Article
10
- 10.1002/micr.30841
- Nov 18, 2021
- Microsurgery
The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OC-RFFF) has been proposed as a safe and reliable free flap for head and neck reconstruction with low donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study is to compare the late complications (>30 days) associated with using the OC-RFFF versus the free fibula flap (FFF) for mandibular reconstruction following oncologic segmental resection. We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study composed of patients who underwent oncologic microvascular composite mandibular reconstruction with either the OC-RFFF or FFF. The primary predictor variable was the type of free flap used. The outcome variable was late complication postoperatively (>30 days). A total of 93 patients (28, OC-RFFF and 65, FFF) were analyzed. The majority of patients were male (62%) and with AJCC stage T4a disease (72%). Mean hospital length of stay was comparable between the two flap groups (p= .50). OC-RFFF was associated with more late complications (p= .03) compared to FFF. Nonunion occurred in 10.7% of OC-RFFF and 0% of FFF. Partial or complete flap failure was seen in 7.1% and 0% in the OC-RFFF and FFF, respectively. Two-year disease-free survival was comparable in both groups (p> .05). The results of this study suggest that the rate of nonunion and odds of having a late complication were significantly greater in the OC-RFFF compared to the FFF following oncologic mandibular reconstruction. However, flap success, early complications (<30 days), and length of hospital stay were comparable between the two flaps.
- Research Article
75
- 10.1097/00006534-199904050-00005
- Apr 1, 1999
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Osseous free flaps have become the preferred method of mandibular reconstruction after oncologic surgical ablation. To elucidate the long-term effects of free flap mandibular reconstruction on bone mass, maintenance or reduction in bone height over time was used as an indirect measure of preservation or loss in bone mass. Factors potentially influencing bone mass preservation were evaluated; these included site of reconstruction (central, body, ramus), patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing osseous free flap mandible reconstruction for oncologic surgical defects between 1987 and 1995 was performed. Postoperative Panorex examinations were used to evaluate bone height and bony union after osteotomy. Fixation hardware was used as a reference to eliminate magnification as a possible source of error in measurement. There were 48 patients who qualified for this study by having at least 24 months of follow-up. There were 27 male and 21 female patients, with a mean age of 45 years (range, 5 to 75 years). Mandibular defects were anterior (24) and lateral (24). Osseous donor sites included the fibula (35), radius (6), scapula (4), and ilium (3). There were between zero and four segmental osteotomies per patient (excluding the ends of the graft). Nineteen percent of all patients had delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. Initial Panorex examinations were taken between 1 and 9 months postoperatively (mean, 2 months). Follow-up Panorex examinations were taken 24 to 104 months postoperatively (mean, 47 months). The bony union rate after osteotomy was 97 percent. Bone height measurements were compared by site and type of reconstruction. The mean loss in fibula height by site of reconstruction was 2 percent in central segments, 7 percent in body segments, and 5 percent in ramus segments. The mean loss in bone height after radial free flap mandible reconstruction was 33 percent in central segments and 37 percent in body segments; ramus segments did not lose height. The central and body segments reconstructed with scapular free flaps did not lose height, but one ramus segment lost 20 percent of height. There was no loss in bone height in mandibular body reconstruction with the ilium free flap. Fibula free flaps did not significantly lose bone height when evaluated with respect to age, follow-up, radiation therapy, or dental implant placement. The retention in bone height demonstrated in this study suggests that bone mass is preserved after osseous free flap mandible reconstruction. The greatest amount of bone loss was seen after multiply osteotomized radial free flaps were used for central mandibular reconstruction. The ability of the fibula free flap to maintain mass over time, coupled with its known advantages, further supports its use as the "work horse" donor site for mandible reconstruction.
- Research Article
74
- 10.1097/00006534-199904020-00005
- Apr 1, 1999
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Osseous free flaps have become the preferred method of mandibular reconstruction after oncologic surgical ablation. To elucidate the long-term effects of free flap mandibular reconstruction on bone mass, maintenance or reduction in bone height over time was used as an indirect measure of preservation or loss in bone mass. Factors potentially influencing bone mass preservation were evaluated; these included site of reconstruction (central, body, ramus), patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing osseous free flap mandible reconstruction for oncologic surgical defects between 1987 and 1995 was performed. Postoperative Panorex examinations were used to evaluate bone height and bony union after osteotomy. Fixation hardware was used as a reference to eliminate magnification as a possible source of error in measurement. There were 48 patients who qualified for this study by having at least 24 months of follow-up. There were 27 male and 21 female patients, with a mean age of 45 years (range, 5 to 75 years). Mandibular defects were anterior (24) and lateral (24). Osseous donor sites included the fibula (35), radius (6), scapula (4), and ilium (3). There were between zero and four segmental osteotomies per patient (excluding the ends of the graft). Nineteen percent of all patients had delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. Initial Panorex examinations were taken between 1 and 9 months postoperatively (mean, 2 months). Follow-up Panorex examinations were taken 24 to 104 months postoperatively (mean, 47 months). The bony union rate after osteotomy was 97 percent. Bone height measurements were compared by site and type of reconstruction. The mean loss in fibula height by site of reconstruction was 2 percent in central segments, 7 percent in body segments, and 5 percent in ramus segments. The mean loss in bone height after radial free flap mandible reconstruction was 33 percent in central segments and 37 percent in body segments; ramus segments did not lose height. The central and body segments reconstructed with scapular free flaps did not lose height, but one ramus segment lost 20 percent of height. There was no loss in bone height in mandibular body reconstruction with the ilium free flap. Fibula free flaps did not significantly lose bone height when evaluated with respect to age, follow-up, radiation therapy, or dental implant placement. The retention in bone height demonstrated in this study suggests that bone mass is preserved after osseous free flap mandible reconstruction. The greatest amount of bone loss was seen after multiply osteotomized radial free flaps were used for central mandibular reconstruction. The ability of the fibula free flap to maintain mass over time, coupled with its known advantages, further supports its use as the “work horse” donor site for mandible reconstruction. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 103: 1371, 1999.)
- Research Article
32
- 10.1001/archotol.134.12.1324
- Dec 15, 2008
- Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
To compare donor site morbidity in patients who have undergone fibula free flap reconstruction in which the skin graft was taken from the expected cutaneous paddle of the fibula with the known complications of the popular technique of obtaining a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) from a secondary donor site. Cohort study. The tertiary care centers at Loma Linda University Medical Center and University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center. From September 1, 2006, to March 30, 2007, 30 patients underwent fibula free flap harvest by 2 surgeons at separate tertiary care centers. Twenty-one of those procedures took place at the University of California, Los Angeles, and 9 at Loma Linda University. Patients included 15 men (50%) and 15 women (50%), with a mean age of 58 (range, 19-88) years. All 30 patients underwent fibula free flap harvest with a split-thickness skin graft (graft thickness, 0.04 cm), obtained from osteocutaneous paddle using a 5.1-cm-wide dermatome, as well as oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction with the de-epithelialized skin paddle. Measures of donor site morbidity, including graft failure and wound breakdown, and measures of recipient site morbidity, including flap failure, hardware complications, intraoral complications, and the need for additional surgery. Of the 30 patients who underwent this procedure, 4 had partial skin graft failures, for a complete skin graft survival of 87%. There were no complete skin graft losses. Regarding the fibula osteocutaneous free flap, there were no complete flap losses, 1 skin paddle necrosis that required debridement, 2 postoperative orocutaneous fistulas, 1 case of infected/extruded hardware, and 1 adhesion formation that required additional surgery for lysis of adhesion and placement of the split-thickness skin graft. The outlined novel technique has similar rates of free flap survival and skin graft take compared with previously described methods. Harvesting the skin graft over the expected osteocutaneous paddle results in decreased lower extremity morbidity by providing equivalent graft tissue for donor site closure and eliminating the morbidity of a secondary donor site. As long as there will not be 2 large opposing grafted surfaces, this technique should be considered when harvesting fibula free flaps for reconstruction of oromandibular resection defects, especially in cancers of the alveolar ridge and floor of the mouth.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1002/micr.30781
- Jun 22, 2021
- Microsurgery
In free osteofasciocutaneous fibula flaps, secondary donor sites are avoided using one of three local closure methods: full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs), split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs), or flaps. This systemic review aimed to evaluate the differences in outcomes among the three groups of closure methods used for free fibula flap defects. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science medical databases from inception to January 2021 for articles focused on closure of the free fibula flap donor site using the lower leg area-local skin graft or flap-that mentioned the free fibula flap defect size, and/or complications of the donor site. Study characteristics, free fibula flap size, and short-term complication rates were extracted for analysis. The pooled complication rates and confidence intervals were calculated based on the random-effects model. Eleven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and ten studies were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The FTSG (n=79, 52.3%) was the most widely used method, while both STSG (n=36, 23.8%) and flap (n=36, 23.8%) were the least commonly used methods. The mean free fibula flap length and width were largest for the flap method (11.5 ± 2.5cm and 6.0 ± 1.8cm), and all closure methods were used for free fibula flap widths ≥3cm. Rates of partial and complete necrosis were highest for the FTSG method (20.3%, p=.95, I2 =0%) and lowest for the flap method (12.7%, p=.95, I2 =0%). This systemic review indicated that any closure method could be adapted for a free fibula flap width ranging from 3 to 9cm, and the flap method was associated with the lowest rate of short-term complications.
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18712-9
- Nov 9, 2025
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18663-1
- Nov 8, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18717-4
- Nov 8, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18716-5
- Nov 8, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18723-6
- Nov 8, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Front Matter
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18650-6
- Nov 7, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18605-x
- Nov 7, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18639-1
- Nov 7, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18292-8
- Nov 7, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1245/s10434-025-18652-4
- Nov 7, 2025
- Annals of surgical oncology
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.