Abstract

This chapter outlines the rationale of the Humanitarian Initiative which underpins the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) and responds to the counter-narratives and critiques against the TPNW presented by nuclear weapons state (NWS) and nuclear-umbrella states. The Humanitarian Initiative and the resulting TPNW challenge the parameters of the nuclear weapons discourse. The Humanitarian Initiative promoted a globalist and comprehensive view of security, in juxtaposition to the “state-centred” security arguments of NWS, who stress that nuclear weapons are essential for their and their allies’ security. In relation to the TPNW, a number of counter-narratives have been and continue to be presented by NWS and nuclear-umbrella states. Given the severity of the humanitarian consequences and risks of nuclear weapons for the entire planet, the “distraction” argument is highly problematic. The TPNW is a particular legal response to the evidence on the humanitarian consequences and risks of nuclear weapons.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.