Abstract

Objectives Surgical treatment of proximal biceps tendinopathy remains a source of great controversy. Current surgical treatment debates center around the fixation location and not the quality of the tendon because little is known about the intra-tendinous pathology to guide this debate. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate two distinct anatomic regions of pathologic biceps tendons with regard to intra-tendinous architecture, painful neurotransmitters, and inflammatory modulators: the intra-articular portion and the extra-articular portion lying in the bicipital groove. Methods Eleven human degenerative biceps tendons were obtained post-tenodesis. They were divided into intra- and extra-articular portions. They underwent histologic staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Alcian blue as well as immunohistochemistry staining for substance P, tyrosine hydroxylase, and neurofilament. Tendon architecture was assessed according to the modified BONAR tendon score. Immunohistochemistry staining was quantified using ImageJ density analysis. Portions of the tendon sections were cultured for 48 hours and the resultant secretome was assessed for Substance P secretion with ELISA analysis. Results Composite BONAR scores demonstrated pathologic tendons with no significant difference between the intra-articular biceps tendon and the portion of the tendon within the bicipital groove (p= 0.31). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis demonstrated significantly (p<0.05) increased uptake of substance P in the bicipital groove tendon compared to the intra-articular tendon while tyrosine hydroxylase did not (p>0.05). Stained substance P and tyr hydroxylase was intimately associated with intra-tendinous vascularity. ELISA results demonstrated significantly increased secretion of substance P in the bicipital groove tendon compared to the intraarticular portion. Conclusion This study shows abnormal architecture, increased release and staining of painful neurotransmitters, and secretion of substance P from the proximal biceps tendon up to the distal aspect of the bicipital groove. Despite varied surgical techniques for tenodesis, this study supports the removal of the entirety of the long head of the biceps to the distal portion of the bicipital groove. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.