Abstract
The objectives of this study were to compare the performance of 3 species on the Hebb-Williams Elevated Pathway Test (EPT) and to compare their EPT performance with that on the Closed Field Test (CFT). Results were considered in terms of overall performance and difficulty order of test problems. As with the CFT, the EPT did not differentiate, in terms of overall performance, between rats and rabbits. Cats performed significantly more efficiently than either rats or rabbits. The order of difficulty of problems was found to be consistent within species but differed rather markedly between species. Correlations between the two tests were found to be high and significant for rats and rabbits but not for cats.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
