Abstract

This is a study of fragmentation of the multilateral trading system through regionalism. It evaluates whether and to what extent regional trade agreements have conflicted with WTO law. The substantive and dispute settlement aspects of conflict are the main focus of this paper. Sections of this paper cover an overview of multilateralism in international trade law, the WTO as a universal regulator of world trade, the proliferation of regional trade agreements, and the general implications of regionalism in trade. The main argument presented is that the proliferation of RTAs gradually erodes the WTO’s core principle of non-discrimination, and consequently impairs the coherence of international trade law.

Highlights

  • The multilateral trading system is facing a great danger of fragmentation

  • Multilateralism, is increasingly becoming ‘clogged by trade barriers created by the proliferation of preferential regional trading blocs’. 1 This paper explores the fragmentation of the multilateral trade regulation system (World Trade Organization or WTO law) by analysing whether and to what extent Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) have conflicted with the Multilateral Trading System (MTS)

  • In order to fully assess possible conflicts between the trading systems and laws, this study finds it essential to pursue a wide definition of conflict of laws. like the Panel has done in EC-Bananas III, i.e. including conflicts that arise if a party ‘cannot simultaneously comply with two different agreements’, and comprising potential conflicts that may occur if a party freely chooses to take advantage of a right or an exception in one agreement, which would result in a breach of the other agreement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The multilateral trading system is facing a great danger of fragmentation. Its modus operandi, multilateralism, is increasingly becoming ‘clogged by trade barriers created by the proliferation of preferential regional trading blocs’. 1 This paper explores the fragmentation of the multilateral trade regulation system (World Trade Organization or WTO law) by analysing whether and to what extent Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) have conflicted with the Multilateral Trading System (MTS). 1 This paper explores the fragmentation of the multilateral trade regulation system (World Trade Organization or WTO law) by analysing whether and to what extent Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) have conflicted with the Multilateral Trading System (MTS). The potential for conflicting rules and clashing courts has, increased immensely It is from this premise that this paper examines how international trade law is fragmented through regionalism. The study commences with a background overview of the WTO as a multilateral or universal institution for the regulation of international trade This is followed by an examination of the proliferation of RTAs; the rules governing the relationship between the WTO and RTAs explaining instances of conflicts of rules and interpretation; and case studies of conflicts in dispute settlement. WINTER ISSUE relationship through an institutional and regulatory perspective, rather than an economic perspective

The WTO Multilateral Trading System
29 See ‘Members and Accession
2 Objectives and Mandate of the WTO
III.1 Defining RTAs
64 See WTO Press Release ‘Fast-Changing Nature of World Trade Poses New
Relationship with the WTO
The WTO-RTA Interface
Erosion of the MFN Obligation
Problematic Rules of Origin
Regulatory Failures under Article XXIV of the GATT 1994
New and Specialised Laws
The Spaghetti-Bowl Problem
Diverting Attention from Multilateralism
Dispute Settlement Issues
VI.1 WTO Dispute Settlement
VI.2 Dispute Settlement within RTAs
VI.3 Case Studies
Concluding Observations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.