Abstract
In this paper we examine the mechanism of DeLP (Defeasible Logic Programming). We first study the definition of the defeating relation in a formal setting that allows us to uncover some hidden assumptions, and suggest an alternative definition. Then we introduce a game-theoretic characterization of the system. We obtain a new set of truth values arising from games in which arguments for and against a given literal are played out. We study how additional constraints define protocols of admissible attacks. The DeLP protocol ensures the finiteness of the games, and therefore the existence of winning strategies for the corresponding games. The defeating relation among arguments determines the strategies that will win and consequently the truth values of queries. We find that the DeLP protocol also excludes the warranting of a literal and its negation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
