Abstract
I’m a big student of the nineteenth century. I love the 1800s, I write about them, and I think about them a lot. There are a lot of questions in modern copyright law where we look back, and we spend time thinking about what was going on in the 1800s and opinions from the 1800s. And so when we came up with this idea to talk about the scope of copyright, I went back to the cases from the 1800s, and the Supreme Court has told us a lot about what is copyrightable and what is not from a perspective of merger—from a perspective of protecting laws or not.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
