Abstract

Mandarin and Cantonese, though are both Chinese, exhibit differences in L2 English pronunciation, especially in obstruent codas. For the reason that only nasals -n, -m and -ng can be found at coda in Mandarin whereas apart from nasals, unreleased consonants -p -t and -k exits as well in Cantonese, it is reasonable to believe that L1 transfer makes influences on modifying codas for L2 learners. This present study aims at comparing the strategies used by Mandarin and Cantonese speakers in coda modification and resyllabification. By embedding the stimuli in a natural conversation, room-cleaning task, data are elicited and analyzed by Praat. Results indicates that up to 93% of codas are released by Mandarin speakers and 41% of those are unreleased by Cantonese speakers. Further, instead of epenthesizing vocalic elements, Mandarin speakers are found to strongly aspirate the codas with 58%, which contradicts most of the previous studies claiming that epenthesis is the main modification used among Mandarin L2 learners.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.