Abstract

This paper will contrast the relatively benign state practice of forcible extraterritorial abduction, as practiced by the United States under the Ker-Frisbe doctrine, with the United States’ more recent practice of extraordinary rendition in violation of the Convention Against Torture and the Ker-Frisbe doctrine. In so doing it will evaluate the liabilities that the violation of international legal obligations has caused for the United States and its allies. The facts of the well known extraordinary rendition of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri as part of the CIA “Rendition Detention and Interrogation” (“RDI”) program will provide insight into the scope of the CIA’s departure from simple extraterritorial abduction during the extraordinary rendition program.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.