Abstract
This paper outlines the historical evolution of Australia’s foreign direct investment (FDI) regulation generally, under national law and more recently bilateral investment treaties (BITs) or investment chapters of free trade agreements (FTAs). This sets the stage for closer analysis of the policy and politics in Australia over treaty-based investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), particularly the binding arbitration mechanism since 2010. The paper concludes by highlighting some key contrasts with ISDS debates in New Zealand, a close trading and investment partner. It has retained more bipartisan support for ISDS in recent years, and FTAs generally, despite emergent concerns in the context of the Korea and Trans-Pacific Partnership FTAs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
