Abstract
Since October 2008 the EU has served as a co-mediator in the Geneva International Discussions (GID) on the conflicts over South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The main finding of the case study is that the EU’s effectiveness in terms of conflict settlement and goal-attainment is relatively low. Conflict parties’ unwillingness to compromise is the primary factor that explains the EU’s ineffectiveness as a co-mediator in the GID. As the zone of agreement on the two most important issues discussed in the GID—the non-use of force and the return of refugees and IDPs—is virtually zero, the negotiations have not made any substantial progress since their inception. The very limited space for compromise agreements strongly constrains the impact that the EU’s (limited) leverage, mediation strategy, coherence and mediator coordination can unfold on mediation effectiveness. Nevertheless, the analysis also points to the importance of the mediators’ approach to promote agreements on low-key issues in order to foster the trust between the conflict parties, a strategy that may only pay off in the long run.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.