Abstract

This article focuses on the right to confrontation in trials before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). There has been a steady erosion of right of the accused to cross-examination as a result of a number of amendments in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence and decisions handed down by various Chambers in the ICTY. This article reviews these matters by examining hearsay evidence, judicial notice, the admission of statements into evidence in place of oral testimony and the relevant provisions of the Statute of the ICTY and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. [U]nder the cloak of ‘fairness’, a court may be led to construe troublesome curtailments of the rights of the accused in specific instances, which in turn might impact on fundamental rights of the accused. ICTY Appeals Chamber, 23 November 2007

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.