Abstract
Many individual Mutagenicity Guidelines contain suggested test systems with choices of such parameters as strains, cell types and even endpoint assayed. Comparisons have been made of data obtained from variants of yeast assays for the induction of mitotic recombination, in vitro assays for the induction of chromosome aberrations and assays for the induction of cell transformation. Individual test variants included in guidelines of the EEC and OECD show considerable qualitative and quantitative variability of response to potential mutagens and carcinogens. Such variability between assays within the same guideline raises considerable problems in the selection of test batteries chosen from published Mutagenicity Guidelines. Improved battery selection is dependent upon the reduction of choice within guidelines to those assays which produce consistent and reproducible results.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
