The effects of endothelin-1 on ischaemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias in rat isolated hearts

Abstract

We have shown previously that a small bolus dose of endothelin-1, given intravenously before coronary occlusion, exerts a marked antiarrhythmic effect in anaesthetised rats. The aim of the current study was to determine whether or not this is due to a direct effect of endothelin-1 on the heart by assessing the antiarrhythmic effect of endothelin-1 against occlusion-induced arrhythmias in rat isolated hearts. Rat isolated hearts were perfused in Langendorff mode (constant flow) and subjected to coronary artery occlusion for 30 min. Coronary perfusion pressure and a surface electrocardiogram (ECG) were monitored throughout the experiment. In the first series of studies, the effects of three 5-min infusions of endothelin-1 (0.1–10 nM), given prior to coronary occlusion, were assessed. A second series of hearts was given a single bolus dose of endothelin-1 (10 pmol) 5 min prior to ischaemia. A third series of experiments was performed using a modified (low K +) Krebs Henseleit solution to increase the incidence of ischaemia-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In these hearts, endothelin-1 (0.1 or 2 pmol) was administered as a bolus injection 5 min before ischaemia. Infusion of endothelin-1 prior to ischaemia did not modify the incidence or severity of arrhythmias at any of the concentrations used. Bolus administration of endothelin-1 (10 pmol) in hearts perfused with Kreb's Henseleit solution containing normal K + (4.4 mM) was found to cause a small rise in coronary perfusion pressure, with no preceding depressor response. Under these conditions, endothelin-1 exerted only a very moderate reduction in arrhythmias, by reducing the arrhythmia count in the 21–30-min post-occlusion period. Furthermore, in hearts perfused with low K + solution, bolus injection of endothelin-1, in a dose that either had no effect on coronary perfusion pressure (0.1 pmol) or produced a significant vasodilator effect with no significant pressor effect (2 pmol), had no effect on ventricular fibrillation. Thus, in concentrations that are sufficient to exert effects on the coronary vasculature, endothelin-1 fails to modify arrhythmias in an isolated heart preparation. These results suggest that the antiarrhythmic effects of endothelin-1 previously observed in vivo are not due to a direct effect on either the myocardium or the coronary blood vessels.