The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined the effects of biphasic truncated exponential waveform design on survival and post-resuscitation myocardial function after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BackgroundBiphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for successful defibrillation, but optimization of energy and current levels to minimize post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been largely unexplored. We examined a low-capacitance waveform typical of low-energy application (low-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEL]; 100 μF, ≤200 J) and a high-capacitance waveform typical of high-energy application (high-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEH]; 200 μF, ≥200 J). MethodsFour groups of anesthetized 40- to 45-kg pigs were investigated. After 7 min of electrically induced VF, a 15-min resuscitation attempt was made using sequences of up to three defibrillation shocks followed by 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Animals were randomized to BTEL at 150 J or 200 J or to BTEH at 200 J or 360 J. ResultsResuscitation was unsuccessful in three of the five animals treated with BTEH at 200 J. All other attempts were successful. Significant therapy effects were observed for survival (p = 0.035), left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), stroke volume (p < 0.001), fractional area change (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p = 0.044), and mean aortic pressure (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic outcomes were negatively associated with energy and average current but positively associated with peak current. Peak current was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001). ConclusionsMaximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform, which delivered higher peak current while minimizing energy and average current.