Abstract

Words that are rated as acquired earlier in life receive shorter fixation durations than later acquired words, even when word frequency is adequately controlled (Juhasz & Rayner, 2003; 2006). Some theories posit that age-of-acquisition (AoA) affects the semantic representation of words (e.g., Steyvers & Tenenbaum, 2005), while others suggest that AoA should have an influence at multiple levels in the mental lexicon (e.g. Ellis & Lambon Ralph, 2000). In past studies, early and late AoA words have differed from each other in orthography, phonology, and meaning, making it difficult to localize the influence of AoA. Two experiments are reported which examined the locus of AoA effects in reading. Both experiments used balanced ambiguous words which have two equally-frequent meanings acquired at different times (e.g. pot, tick). In Experiment 1, sentence context supporting either the early- or late-acquired meaning was presented prior to the ambiguous word; in Experiment 2, disambiguating context was presented after the ambiguous word. When prior context disambiguated the ambiguous word, meaning AoA influenced the processing of the target word. However, when disambiguating sentence context followed the ambiguous word, meaning frequency was the more important variable and no effect of meaning AoA was observed. These results, when combined with the past results of Juhasz and Rayner (2003; 2006) suggest that AoA influences access to multiple levels of representation in the mental lexicon. The results also have implications for theories of lexical ambiguity resolution, as they suggest that variables other than meaning frequency and context can influence resolution of noun-noun ambiguities.

Highlights

  • Over the past three decades, a sizeable literature naming (e.g. Catling & Johnston, 2006; 2009; Ellis &demonstrating that words acquired earlier in life are Morrison, 1998), and semantic categorization

  • Clear effects of meaning AoA for balanced ambiguous words are demonstrated in this experiment

  • Processing measures such as first fixation duration are shorter for balanced ambiguous words when sentence context provides support for an early-acquired meaning, as compared to a late-acquired meaning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brysbaert, Van Wijnendaele, & De Deyne, 2000; Catling amassed (see Juhasz, 2005 for a review). AoA acquisition (AoA) effects have been observed in a number has been found to influence fixation durations on of experimental tasks, including word naming (e.g. words embedded in neutral sentences (Juhasz & Rayner, Gerhand & Barry, 1998; Ghyselinck, Lewis, & Brysbaert, 2003; 2006). Cortese & Khanna, 2007; Ghyselinck et al, 2004; While AoA effects are widely accepted, the Menenti & Burani, 2007; Morrison & Ellis, 1995), picture mechanism by which these effects are produced is still.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.