Abstract
This study compared counterrotational-action power toothbrushing with manual toothbrushing in effectiveness on plaque control and gingival health in 20 randomly selected orthodontic patients at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. A blind two-group crossover design was used. Gingival and plaque scores were recorded, and a prophylaxis was given to bring the plaque score to zero. Ten subjects received counterrotational power brushes, and ten subjects received manual brushes. Instructions appropriate to each brushing method were given by a hygienist. At 30 and 60 days, plaque and gingival scores were recorded and a prophylaxis was given. At 60 days the subjects who were using power brushes were switched to manual brushes, and the subjects who were using manual brushes were switched to power brushes. At 30 and 60 days, plaque and gingival scores were recorded and a prophylaxis was given. Plaque and gingival scores were significantly less (p less than 0.01) after brushing 2 months with the counterrotational power brush than with the manual brush. This finding was irrespective of the sequence in which the brushes were used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
