Abstract
Ventilating tube treatment (VT) is a common surgical procedure in preschool children. Twenty to fifty percent of children treated with VT suffer from recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM). The aim of this review is to update current knowledge on the topic. There is still controversy regarding the use of VT for children with RAOM. So far, only six randomized trials have been published. From the limited data pool, it seems that children with RAOM treated with VT experienced less time with acute otitis media and experienced less recurrence compared to controls. However, no difference in quality of life was found between subgroups in one trial. Children with RAOM seem to benefit from VT on objective parameters, especially if middle ear effusion is present in between acute episodes. There is a need for more high quality evidence on the subjective domains such as disease severity and quality of life.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
