The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on bispectral index during major abdominal surgery.

Abstract

Intraoperative lidocaine infusion has become widely accepted as an adjunct to general anesthesia where its use has been associated with opioid-sparing and enhanced recovery. The aims of this study were to determine whether or not intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion (a) has an anesthetic sparing effect during major colorectal procedures and (b) if it also affects level of hypnosis as measured by bispectral index (BIS). Twenty-five patients undergoing laparotomy for resection of colorectal tumours were randomized to receive either IV lidocaine (1.5mg kg-1 bolus then 1mg kg-1 per hour) or an equivalent volume of normal saline commenced after intravenous induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained with volatile anesthetic agent combined with intermittent IV fentanyl titrated to hemodynamic stability. Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of volatile was calculated using an age-adjusted algorithm (corrected MAC). BIS values were recorded throughout; however, treating anesthesiologists were blinded to BIS values and hence they were not used to guide depth of anesthesia. No other regional anesthesia techniques were used. During the maintenance phase of anesthesia, corrected MAC of volatile agent was lower (1.0 versus 1.1, p = 0.003); whereas BIS values were higher (45 versus 39, p < 0.001) in patients who received lidocaine versus placebo. No differences in mean arterial pressure (80 versus 80mmHg, p = 0.796) or total fentanyl dose (538 versus 444 mcg, p = 0.24) were observed between the two groups. Heart rate was slightly higher in patients who received lidocaine versus placebo (67 versus 64bpm, p = 0.001). Lidocaine infusion resulted in mean plasma levels of 1.7 mcg ml-1 (1.3-2.0 mcg ml-1, 95% CI). Our results support an anesthetic sparing effect of lidocaine infusion indicated by lower MAC requirements. Higher BIS values in the lidocaine versus placebo group may indicate that levels of hypnosis were not equivalent. Alternatively, BIS may not be a sensitive indicator of synergistic interactions between local anesthetic and volatile agent. Our results advocate a cautious approach to titration of general anesthesia when combined with lidocaine infusion.