Abstract
The amounts of root canal material extruded from extracted teeth using four instrumentation techniques were compared. Eighty extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals and root curvatures of 9 to 28 degrees were divided into four groups: 1, conventional filing technique; 2, cervical flaring technique; 3, ultrasonic technique; and 4, sonic technique. The teeth were opened for endodontic access and a #10 file passed 1 mm beyond the apex to ensure canal patency. All teeth were prepared 1-mm short of the apical foramen. Debris extruded in each case was collected and weighed after it was desiccated. The mean weights of extruded material for the groups were compared by analysis of variance. There was a statistically significant difference in debris extrusion between the conventional filing technique and the sonic technique. The groups ranked from lowest to highest in debris extrusion were as follows: 1, sonic technique; 2, cervical flaring technique; 3, ultrasonic technique; and 4, conventional technique.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.