The effect of foot bath on symptom control in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the adequacy of treatment for constipation, nausea, depression and poor sleep and the factors associated with inadequate symptom control in cancer patients receiving opioids.MethodsPatients receiving strong opioids for cancer pain were recruited from 17 centres in 11 European countries. By using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, 1,938 patients reported their symptoms at four-point scales. Health care providers assessed symptoms at corresponding four-point scales and registered use of medications, demographic and disease-related variables. Symptomatic treatment was scored as 1 if not administered during the past 24 h and as 2 if administered. Adequacy of treatment was evaluated by subtracting the patients’ symptom score from the treatment score. Negative scores, caused by either no treatment or ineffective treatment of a symptom, were interpreted as inadequate treatment.ResultsApproximately 60% of patients with constipation, depression or poor sleep and 45% of nauseated patients were inadequately treated. Numbers of inadequately treated patients varied between countries. In general, underestimation of symptom intensity by health care providers (p < 0.001), low performance status (p < 0.05) and recent initiation of opioids (p < 0.05) increased the risk of inadequate treatment. The subset of demographic- and disease-related factors associated with inadequate treatment varied between the symptoms investigated.ConclusionsInadequate treatment, either no treatment or ineffective treatment, was frequent in cancer patients. There were subgroups of patients at particular risk for inadequate treatment, which might need additional attention from health care providers for achievement of adequate symptom control.

Treatment in cancer is aimed at improving survival (curing where possible) and/or improving symptoms. Symptoms may be caused by the cancer itself (primary tumour, metastases, or paraneoplastic phenomenon) or by the treatments patients undergo to treat the cancer (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and biological therapy). Therefore, symptom control is one of the key roles of oncologists as they treat cancer patients. The most important part of symptom control in cancer patients is to elucidate the underlying cause of the symptom. Symptom control is most effective when the underlying cause is targeted; for example, shoulder pain may be treated most effectively by local radiotherapy if it is due to a bone metastasis in the humeral head, by dexamethasone if it is referred pain due to diaphragmatic irritation from hepatomegaly, and by amitriptyline or gabapentin if it is neuropathic pain due to cervical nerve root irritation. Covering all symptom control in cancer patients is beyond the remit of this chapter; however, it will cover the control of pain and nausea and vomiting, as these are very common symptoms in cancer patients.

The care of patients at the end of life focuses on preservation of the quality of life, symptom control and fulfillment of the preferred place of death. Only few care and outcome-related data for primary palliative care in Germany are available; therefore, the objective was to examine the quality of life, symptom control and place of death of patients with palliative treatment by general practitioners (GP). The study is part of the PAMINO project, a non-randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of continuing medical education for GPs (≥ 40h) in palliative care (ISRCTN78021852). Cancer patients with an estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months were recruited by GPs with (PG) or without (CG) continuing education and documented the diagnosis, medication based on the hospice and palliative care collation ( Hospiz- und Palliativ-Erfassung, HOPE) core documentation and the preferred place of death. Patients rated their symptom burden and health-related quality of life using the quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C15-PAL). Baseline (t0) data at enrollment and the last individual (t1) assessment were used for the analysis. Data of 68 patients (PG: n = 43, CG: n = 25, mean age 69.2 ± 12 years, average time since cancer diagnosis 14 months) were available at t0 and t1 (mean period 4.0 ± 2.1 months). Physical function decreased while emotional functioning remained stable. Patient-perceived pain did not increase; however, GPs intensified the pain therapy. The PGs prescribed non-opioid analgesics more frequently than CGs. During the observation period 59 patients died of which 40 out of 48 (83 %) as preferred at home. Stable emotional functioning, good symptom control in cancer patients at the end of life and the high rate of dying at home as preferred suggest that GPs with specific training can ensure high-quality general palliative care.

This cross-sectional study was planned to evaluate the self-efficacy and symptom control of cancer patients and to determine the factors affecting them. The sample of the study consisted of 329 cancer patients who were treated in the Medical Oncology Clinic of a university hospital between April and June 2019 and accepted to participate in the study. Data were collected using the Patient Characteristics Information Form, Cancer Behavior Inventory-Short Version (CBI-SV), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Percentage, mean, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance were used in the analysis of the data. The mean CBI-SV score of the patients was 79.10 ± 17.55. It was determined that the highest mean score of ESAS of the patients was in the symptom of fatigue (3.53 ± 2.81). Some symptoms were statistically lower in patients with good income, who are working, and who are non-smokers. Also it was determined that the self-efficacy levels of the patients with good income and quitting smoking were higher (p < 0.05). At the same time, as the patients' self-efficacy scores increased, the severity of the symptoms they experienced decreased statistically (p < 0.05). It was found that the patients' self-efficacy score was above the moderate level, the most intense symptom experienced by the patients was fatigue, and the severity of the symptoms decreased as the patients' self-efficacy level increased. In line with these results; the symptoms, self-efficacy perceptions, and affecting factors of cancer patients should be evaluated by nurses at regular intervals, and care and consultancy services should be provided.

Symptom control in cancer patients

Rectally administered medications are essential in palliative medicine, particularly in the last days of life. They are underutilized. The pharmacology of rectally administered medications relates not only to the medication but also to the suppository base, additives, drug ionization, p K(a), absorptive surface of the rectum, and rectal health. The pharmacokinetics may differ from those of orally administered medications owing to reduced hepatic first-pass clearance. In this review the pharmacology of rectally administered palliative medications is reviewed and the use of individual drugs is outlined.

Bitter ginger (Zingiber zerumbet) for patients with solid tumors with no treatment options: A pilot clinical study

Proper approach to symptom control in cancer patients requires a good understanding of the prevalence of the various symptoms these patients have. This study aims at assessing the Lebanese oncologists’ point of view concerning the symptom burden among cancer patients of Lebanon and comparing their opinions to the real complaints of patients themselves. A cross-sectional study was conducted among a representative sample of the Lebanese medical oncologists. Thirty-six physicians filled out a questionnaire regarding their demographics as well as the symptom profile of their patients. Those results were compared to the ones obtained from our previous study about symptom profile as reported by patients. Fatigue was the symptom most our patients suffered from according to their physicians (64.167%). Also, a good percentage of physicians agreed that patients suffer from appetite loss, pain, weight loss, and nausea. When compared to the patients’ reports of their own symptoms, a statistically significant difference existed between the two profiles for the majority of symptoms (14 out of 19). Also, for the majority of symptoms, physicians were found to underestimate the percentage of patients suffering from each symptom. This study shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the physicians’ and the patients’ perspectives on most of the common distressing symptoms. This entails more detailed questioning of the cancer patients about their distressing symptoms.

Russia: The State-of-the-Art of Palliative Care

Many patients suffering from cancer make use of complementary therapies, with aromatherapy being a popular choice. Quantitative studies, using questionnaire data, have shown that aromatherapy may reduce psychological distress and enhance symptom control in cancer patients. However, little is known about the personal meanings patients associate with the therapy. This study explored the patients' experiences of aromatherapy using of a focus group interview. Eight themes emerged from the analysis, six of which have been acknowledged to some extent by previous authors: de-stressing effects of aromatherapy, the counselling role of the aromatherapist, aromatherapy as a reward, patient empowerment, communication through touch, and negative aspects of the service. Two apparently new themes emerged concerned with security of context (where the aromatherapy took place) and preconceived perceptions of the value of aromatherapy as a treatment of cancer patients. The implications of the findings are discussed in relation to the perceived role of counselling, collaborative practice and training in complementary therapies.

Some cancer patients use therapeutic massage to reduce symptoms, improve coping, and enhance quality of life. Although a meta-analysis concludes that massage can confer short-term benefits in terms of psychological wellbeing and reduction of some symptoms, additional validated randomized controlled studies are necessary to determine specific indications for various types of therapeutic massage. In addition, mechanistic studies need to be conducted to discriminate the relative contributions of the therapist and of the reciprocal relationship between body and mind in the subject. Nuclear magnetic resonance techniques can be used to capture dynamic in vivo responses to biomechanical signals induced by massage of myofascial tissue. The relationship of myofascial communication systems (called "meridians") to activity in the subcortical central nervous system can be evaluated. Understanding this relationship has important implications for symptom control in cancer patients, because it opens up new research avenues that link self-reported pain with the subjective quality of suffering. The reciprocal body-mind relationship is an important target for manipulation therapies that can reduce suffering.

Corticosteroids are used adjuvant to certain chemotherapy regimens, either as an antiemetic, to reduce other side effects, or to enhance cancer treatment. Additionally, they are frequently used for symptom control in cancer patients with end stage disease. Corticosteroid use may induce hyperglycemia in approximately 20-50% of patients, which may negatively affect patient outcomes. To determine the frequency of blood glucose monitoring in patients with and without diabetes receiving continuous corticosteroids with chemotherapy, and to determine the incidence of treatment-emergent abnormal blood glucose levels and steroid-induced diabetes mellitus (DM). A retrospective review was conducted for 30 genitourinary (GU) cancer patients who were treated with continuous oral corticosteroids as part of their chemotherapy regimen. The Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) criterion for diagnosis of diabetes was applied to categorize patients into two distinct groups, patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes. This categorization was made based on glucose measurements completed prior to commencement of corticosteroid therapy. Glucose monitoring was defined as receiving a laboratory blood glucose test before first chemotherapy administration along with a test within a week of each subsequent treatment cycle. The CDA criteria for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes was used to classify glucose levels as hyperglycemic. The mean incidence of blood glucose monitoring was 19% and 76% in patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes, respectively. Approximately, 40% of patients with diabetes required an adjustment to their diabetes management and a further 20% required hospitalization. Fifteen patients without diabetes received a fasting blood glucose test, of which 40% had abnormal blood glucose results; half of these fell into the pre-diabetic range and half in the diabetic range. Ten patients without diabetes were tested for diabetes using the CDA criteria for diabetes diagnosis during or after their chemotherapy, of which 30% developed diabetes. In order to optimize patient care, blood glucose levels should be monitored in all patients receiving continuous oral corticosteroids as part of their chemotherapy. Future studies should be conducted prospectively to determine the most effective manner of monitoring in order to implement screening guidelines and avoid unnecessary morbidity.

Objectives: Evidence indicates there are beneficial physical and psychosocial effects from practicing yoga in cancer patients and survivors. Despite yoga having been incorporated into National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for symptoms ranging from fatigue to pain, patients' use of yoga for supportive care is low, ranging from 6% to 12%. This study aims to evaluate the awareness of yoga as therapy in an academic cancer center and the preferences for information delivery in this population. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at an urban academic cancer center. Responses regarding awareness and use of yoga were evaluated; those responding "not aware" were analyzed for preferences in information delivery. Univariate analysis was used to further characterize awareness of yoga for supportive care. Results: Of 303 respondents, 68% were female, 77% were white, and 75% were college educated. Despite access to yoga at the cancer center, 171 (56%) patients expressed they were not aware of the availability of yoga. Male patients were more likely to be unaware of yoga (72.4% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.045). Awareness did not vary by age, race, educational attainment, marital status, cancer type, or cancer stage. Of the 171 "not aware" patients, 87.6% expressed desire for information in the form of printed material, followed by 80.4% for e-mail, 37.6% for smartphone application, and 27.6% for social media. Non-white respondents were more likely to express interest in receiving information by smartphone. Conclusions: More than half of cancer patients were unaware of the yoga program despite advertising across the institution. Patients prefer varying methods for information receipt, with preferences differing by sociodemographic factors. Targeted education and outreach using appropriate engagement is needed to improve the awareness of yoga for symptom control in cancer patients.

Hypnosis has been shown to alleviate symptoms and side effects of cancer and its treatment. However, less is known about the use of hypnosis at the end of life in individuals with cancer. Our goal was to systematically review the literature on the use of hypnosis to manage the most common symptoms of end-of-life cancer patients: fatigue, sleep disturbances, pain, appetite loss, and dyspnea. EMBASE, MEDLINE, COCHRANE, PsychINFO, and SCOPUS databases were searched from inception through November 7, 2016. No studies met the inclusion criteria. It appears that hypnosis has never been rigorously tested as a means to ameliorate the most common symptoms in individuals with cancer at the end of their lives. This finding is troubling, as it strongly implies that a population most in need has been largely neglected. However, a clear future research direction is revealed that may have significant clinical impact.

Current technology suggests that acupuncture modulates neurological processes within the central nervous system, especially the spinal cord gating mechanisms, cerebral subcortical nuclei, and the hypothalamic-endocrine axis. Many single arm clinical studies report the effectiveness of acupuncture for controlling symptoms in cancer patients. However, the challenge has been to separate the nonspecific effects of the practitioner, as well as regression to the mean, from the neurophysiological effects of needle penetration. Recently, randomized controlled trials have attempted to answer this question, with mixed results. For example, needle penetration (or equivalent stimulation) is effective for nausea and vomiting, whereas it does not appear to be a major factor in reducing hot flashes. Safety and quality are priorities, so regulation of the practice of acupuncture is important, as well as excellent communication between practitioners. In addition, continuing research is mandatory, using validated methodology and reporting principles as outlined in the CONSORT and STRICTA recommendations.