Abstract

4591 Background: Current intravesical treatments of Ta-T1 urinary bladder cancer have shown good efficacy, but improvement is needed. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of 3 different dose regimens of gemcitabine administered intravesically to patients with urinary bladder cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically proven stage Ta, grade 1/2 urinary bladder cancer and a marker lesion diameter of 0.5 to 1 cm after transurethral resection were enrolled; they received gemcitabine 2000 mg that was instilled and kept in the bladder for 1 hour. Patients were randomized to one of the following regimens: 1 dose (group A); 2 doses/week for 3 weeks (group B); or 1 dose/week for 6 weeks (group C). Response was assessed via cystoscopy 9 weeks after the end of treatment. Results: Between January 2002 and March 2004, 32 patients were enrolled; 2 were excluded due to protocol violations (groups B and C). Of the 30 randomized patients (11, group A; 10, group B; 9, group C), 1 patient was not evaluable for efficacy (group A). Nine patients (31%) reported a complete response (1, group A; 4, group B; 4, group C); an additional 9 patients (31%) had no response; and 11 (38%) had a tumor increase. All 30 patients were evaluable for toxicity. No NCI-CTC grade 3/4 toxicity was observed. Grade 1/2 nausea was reported in 5 patients (17%), and grade 1/2 fever in 2 patients (7%). One patient (3%) had grade 1 thrombocytopenia, which was reversible, and 1 of the patients with fever had grade 1 anemia, which was also reversible. Instillations were discontinued due to toxicity for only 1 patient (nausea, fever). Ten patients (33%) were unable to retain the drug for the full hour. Conclusions: As an intravesical instillation, gemcitabine showed activity and was well tolerated. The single-dose regimen does not appear to be effective. Also, twice-weekly doses do not appear to be more effective than once-weekly doses. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Eli Lilly

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.