Abstract

Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIB) are growing in popularity for many applications. Much research has been focusing on battery performance improvement. However, few studies have overcome the disadvantages of the conventional LIB manufacturing processes. Laser cutting of electrodes has been applied. However, the effect of electrodes’ chemical, physical, and geometrical characteristics on the laser cutting has not been considered. This study proposes the effect of compression of cathode on laser cutting for lithium-ion batteries. The kerf width and top width of the specimens with laser irradiation are measured and the material removal energy is obtained. Observations of SEM photographs and absorptivity measurements are conducted. Increasing volume energies causes logarithmic increases in the kerf and top width. It is observed that the compressed cathode forms a wider kerf width than the uncompressed cathode under the same laser parameters. The top width of the uncompressed cathode is wider than the uncompressed cathode. The compression has a favorable effect on uniform cutting and selective removal of an active electrode.

Highlights

  • Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has been used actively due to their advantages such as a high energy density and low self-discharge compared to nickel-cadmium and lead-acid batteries

  • This study proposes the effect of compression of cathode on laser cutting for lithium-ion batteries

  • This study proposes the effect of compression of cathode on laser cutting for lithium-ion batteries and subsequently derives four main conclusions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has been used actively due to their advantages such as a high energy density and low self-discharge compared to nickel-cadmium and lead-acid batteries. The width of the cathode sample was 30 mm, and the cutting distance was 20 mm horizontally so that even though the laser cut sample was completely separated, the rest of the sample remains attached The material properties of aluminum can be found from Lee’s paper [12]

Results and Discussion
Comparison of Compressed and Uncompressed Cathode
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.