Abstract
AbstractThe East West Link (EWL) project was to have been a $22.8 billion public–private partnership (PPP) to construct and manage an 18 kilometre road linking freeways east and west of Melbourne. Contracts were signed before and terminated after a state election by different governments. These actions are examples of government control over traditional governance conventions and operational outcomes, also referred to as the ‘crash‐through’ approach. This long‐term infrastructure PPP project enabled the first government to crash‐through its infrastructure plans. However, the newly elected government argued that a new democratic mandate was more important than commercial contract continuation. This option came with a significant cost in excess of $1.1 billion. The project's failure to launch is examined via key events and controversies, and fulfilment of 13 PPP requirements. None were fulfilled, including the proper choice of a PPP as the procurement method and the delivery of value for money. Lessons learnt include the risk of suboptimal PPP outcomes when substandard and rushed state advice is used for decision making. We consider Victoria's Auditor‐General's new ‘follow‐the‐money’ powers and the recently established Infrastructure Victoria in addressing PPP legitimacy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
