Abstract
Two hundred and sixty monolinguals divided into subgroups based on gender, handedness, and familial left-handedness, were given a concurrent task, verbal-manual interference paradigm. The primary purpose of the study was to test whether the dual task interference effects were more related to hemispheric speech or manual dominance factors. The dominant hand, regardless of handedness, underwent relatively more tapping interference than the nondominant hand. The obtained results seriously question the basic assumptions underlying the interpretation of the dual task paradigm as an assessment index for hemispheric language lateralization. A possible explanation of this result that is in keeping with known hemispheric language representation proportions in left-handers is offered based on left hemisphere ipsilateral control of the left hand.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
