Abstract

One effective method to help the UK achieve GHG emission reduction targets is to reduce and decarbonise the heat demand of solid-walled terraced houses, as there are over 2.5 million such buildings making up a significant proportion of the whole building stock. Currently measures are achieved separately: the heat demand could be reduced by application of External Wall Insulation (EWI) or decarbonised through low carbon heat supplied by District Heating Networks (DHN). However, when installed individually, both these technologies face economic cost barriers. This study presents a novel solution that combines district heating pipes into external wall insulation—the District Heating Wall (DHWall) —and provides a systematic and quantitative assessment on its effects on the heating loads and its associated carbon emissions and capital costs. First a dynamic thermal model was developed to predict the heat demand of a case study terraced house with and without EWI. Two district heating networks were then sized to transport the required heat to the house-conventional and DHWall. The DHWall was compared to existing options and initial design parameters cal- culated. The study found application of EWI reduced space heating demand by 14%. The DHWall could reduce mains pipe inside diameter by 47% and reduce network pipe lengths by 20% and require no civils cost. Together these factors reduced DH capital costs by 76%. For one terraced house, the DHWall saved 34 tonnes of carbon over a 20year period compared to 8tonnes saved by EWI alone. Such savings were achieved at 39% of the cost/tonne. The mains pipe of the DHWall was calculated to have an inside diameter of 32.6 mm. The minimum insulation thickness required for solid walls to reach U-values of 0.3 W/m2K was calculated to be 120 mm of mineral wool or 65 mm of phenolic foam. The study concludes the DHWall has potential to contribute to GHG emission reductions by increasing market penetration of DH and EWI and should be investigated further.

Highlights

  • Heat for domestic dwellings accounts for 26% of total UK energy demand and over 21% of UK carbon emissions [1]. 91% of dwellings have central heating, with the majority (87% in 2006) gas fired and less than 1% of heat is from renewable sources [2].There are approximately 2.5 million pre-1919 terraced homes in England, with the majority having solid wall construction [3]

  • Measures are achieved separately: the heat demand could be reduced by application of External Wall Insulation (EWI) or decarbonised through low carbon heat supplied by District Heating Networks (DHN)

  • This study presents a novel solution that combines district heating pipes into external wall insulation—the District Heating Wall (DHWall) —and provides a systematic and quantitative assessment on its effects on the heating loads and its associated carbon emissions and capital costs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heat for domestic dwellings accounts for 26% of total UK energy demand and over 21% of UK carbon emissions [1]. 91% of dwellings have central heating, with the majority (87% in 2006) gas fired and less than 1% of heat is from renewable sources [2].There are approximately 2.5 million pre-1919 terraced homes in England, with the majority having solid wall construction [3]. Heat for domestic dwellings accounts for 26% of total UK energy demand and over 21% of UK carbon emissions [1]. 91% of dwellings have central heating, with the majority (87% in 2006) gas fired and less than 1% of heat is from renewable sources [2]. There are approximately 2.5 million pre-1919 terraced homes in England, with the majority having solid wall construction [3]. As part of the UK strategy to reduce residential sector emissions by 12% by 2020, the Committee on Climate Change proposed 2 million such homes should be insulated by 2020 [4]. BRE analysis indicates that installing Solid Wall Insulation (SWI) offers the greatest potential savings of all the insulation measures possible for the overall housing stock [5]. Costs of SWI are generally high and this is a significant barrier to wider uptake [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.