The Diagnostic Potential of the L Score for ABO Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the L score, a novel scoring system, in distinguishing between ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn (ABO-HDN) and non-hemolytic disease of newborn hyperbilirubinemia (NHDNH).MethodsA cross-sectional prospective study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the L score in distinguishing between ABO-HDN (n = 118) and NHDNH (n = 213). Blood routine examination results were collected, and relevant statistical analyses were performed to identify clinically significant parameters. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the relationship between the L score and the development of these conditions, considering relevant variables.ResultsOur study identified the red blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, red blood cell distribution width—coefficient of variation, and red blood cell distribution width—standard deviation as independent risk factors for distinguishing ABO-HDN from other high bilirubinemia conditions (P < 0.001). The L score demonstrated superior predictive performance for ABO-HDN, exhibiting an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.746, with an optimal cutoff value of − 3.0816. The RBC-L score exhibited superior predictive performance (z: 5.596, P < 0.0001) compared to the single-factor RBC indicator, indicating its efficacy in accurately identifying the desired outcome.ConclusionThe L score represents a valuable tool for predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and hemolytic disease, facilitating differentiation, and guiding early intervention for improved outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate and expand the applicability of the L score in clinical practice.