Abstract
The article analyses the act of destroying evidence searched in a search and seizure procedure, and weather or not such an act is incriminated or should be incriminated if committed by the author of the original crime. The problem was raised as the need to respect the defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination extends to the right not to provide evidence against oneself. Therefore, the article is set to establish the correlation between perpetrating such an act and exercising a procedural right, form a criminal law, procedural law and human rights point of view.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.