Abstract
The two angels Hārūt and Mārūt are mentioned together with the prophet Solomon in the ‘magic pericope’ of Sūrat al-Baqara (Q. 2:101–103). Rashīd Riḍā and his mentor Muḥammad ῾Abduh rejected the folkloric, mythical legends that surrounded the two angels Hārūt and Mārūt and the image of Solomon as a magus-like figure, seeing it as a threat to the rational interpretation of the Qur’ān. In his exegesis, Tafsīr al-Manār, Riḍā includes a relatively substantial tract denouncing magic and its use, entitled Mabḥath al-siḥr wa-Hārūt wa-Mārūt. This article will provide an analysis of exegetical and homiletic features used in this section, focusing on four areas: (i) elements of homiletic antisemitism; (ii) the invocation of personal experience; (iii) the use of lexicology to demystify Qur’ānic references to magic; and (iv) the use of a variant reading to demythologize the story. The aim of this article is to explore the ways in which the rejection of magic is articulated and which homiletic and exegetic tools Riḍā uses to support his position. A final section will explore the modernist movement’s relationship with biblical studies and the influence that it may have had on the interpretation of myth in the Tafsīr al-Manār.
Highlights
Introduction in antiChristian polemic, such as in Rid. a’s arguments against Jesus’s crucifixion
The two angels letic Devices Used in the c pericope
homiletic features used in thisasbeocutitobny
Summary
God, pretending rnejoecttRstioid.t arweghciovoleegshntehaiezrtfeeodlikltyl.oarnicdimcoamgpe loefteSloy.loOmnoenofasthaemtoaoglsichael figure very short shrift and uses is a sustained polemic ey followed what the devils haagdainnstaJrerwaitsehdthdouugrhitn, gargtuhiengrtehiagtnthoe fimSaogleoo-f Solomon as some sort of magus was was not Solomon who disbeinliterovdeudce;drbayththeerJ,ewits.wHaeswtrhitees:disbelieving as they who taught mankind sorcery and what was revealed to in. These taught no one without first telling them: mere temptation, so do not disbelieve”. Solomon never commits idolatry in the Muslim accounts, he is rebuked by the prophet Asaph bḥath al-siḥr wa-Hārūt wa-Mārūt’ al-Manār. 7. The Influence of Biblical Criticism on the Demystification of Harut and Marut. Muslim interest in biblical criticism owes much of its origins to nineteenth century. The nineteenth engagement with Christian thought, with the ystification of Magic in the Tafsīr al-Manār: An on of Magic and Hārūt and MIndāiarnūtS’h; ̄ı ̄ıAthbedoulohgiaannRdah.Rmiaḍtāu,llah Kayranawı/Kayranavı
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
