Abstract
The European Commission has promised to promote decent work in the African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries through facilitation of pro-poor direct investment and livelihood-creating trade deals. Aligning with the discourse of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), the European Commission seeks to ensure that ‘globalisation works for the poor’ and that economic growth is translated into decent jobs and poverty reduction. The paper argues, however, that there is disjuncture between the norms of the European Commission as espoused under the Decent Work Agenda and the tangible implications of European interventions in ACP economies. The implementation of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) will have deleterious consequences for the lives of many poorer producers and workers in ACP agricultural and manufacturing sectors. The provision of Aid for Trade for Decent Work, moreover, may not deliver meaningful decent work opportunities in ACP countries.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
