Abstract
To the Editor: —Through an abstract that appeared inThe Journal(May 12, 1923, p. 1418) our attention has been directed to the article of Pouliot and Truchard, criticizing our article: The Dangers of Pituitary Extract (The Journal, May 21, 1921, p. 1390). Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to secure a copy of the journal containing Pouliot and Truchard's paper; but, assuming that the abstract correctly represents it, we feel that the statements contained in it create an incorrect impression and should not be passed unchallenged. In the abstract, it appears that the entire basis for the criticism of Pouliot and Truchard consists of the inadequacy of our case reports of clinical rupture of the uterus following the employment of pituitary solution. As a matter of fact, the mention of such cases in our paper was merely incidental, and constituted only a portion of the argument against the
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
