Abstract

The main goal of this study is that electricity unit price is lower than 6 cents (US) producing in a CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) plant. For this goal, the paper suggests an integrated facility with thermal energy storage. The plant includes heliostat area, air cavity receiver, gas turbine package (compressor, combustion chamber and generator), steam turbine and generator, heat exchanger, sensible thermal energy storage system and condenser. The process details are heated air through SIC (Silicon Carbide) air cavity tube receiver will be sent to the gas turbine (Brayton Cycle) and hot air from output of gas turbine will be source to heat exchanger to steam production. Steam from output of the heat exchanger will be supplied to the TES (Thermal Energy Storage) for its charging and second turbine (Rankine Cycle) for to generate electricity. Thus, the total efficiency of the plant reaches 55% during sunshine. Assumptions that is to calculate unit price are several schedules and interest rates for every year and amortization and taxation are ignored. With these assumptions, the paper's aim is achieving the goal with 5.7 US ¢/kWhe for 13 years return time, %3 interest rate without subsidizing.

Highlights

  • Steam turbines (Rankine Cycle), Cengel and Boles [1], are used for electricity production in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant Kreith and Goswami [2]; efficiencies are limited

  • If two CSP-Tower plants, Boerema et al [3] and Law et al [4, 5], that are having the same number of heliostat and location are compared in terms of efficiency and electricity production, it is seen that this unique facility reaches the target cost

  • Air camefrom the compressor is heated in SiC Haynes [6] air cavity receiver to higher temperature and taken to the combustion chamber in this design facility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Steam turbines (Rankine Cycle), Cengel and Boles [1], are used for electricity production in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant Kreith and Goswami [2]; efficiencies are limited. If two CSP-Tower plants, Boerema et al [3] and Law et al [4, 5], that are having the same number of heliostat and location are compared in terms of efficiency and electricity production, it is seen that this unique facility reaches the target cost. Another significant point is reduction of carbon emission for the design of CSP-Tower facility. The gas turbine system consumes less fuel and releases lower greenhouse gases

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.