Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of decoding and reading fluency to reading comprehension and how it differs across different types of comprehension measures among 4th-grade students with reading difficulties and disabilities (M age = 9.8, SD = 0.6). Results indicated that decoding and reading fluency predicted 8.1% to 43.3% of the variance in reading comprehension. Decoding and reading fluency accounted for 8.1% of the variance associated with performance on the Comprehension subtest of the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Test, 22.5% for the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC), and 43.3% for the Woodcock–Johnson III Passage Comprehension subtest (WJ3–PC). Decoding explained −0.2% of the variance for the Gates–MacGinitie, 3.1% for the TOSREC, and 15.1% for the WJ3–PC. Reading fluency individually accounted for 3.9% of the variance for the Gates–MacGinitie, 4.5% for the TOSREC, and 1.9% for the WJ3–PC. We discuss the limitations and practical implications of these findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
