Abstract
The optimal procedure to be followed after colonoscopic polypectomy of malignant colorectal polyps with nontumour-free resection margins at histology is a matter of controversy. While some authors recommend merely local or segmental follow-up resection, others favour an oncological resection. One hundred five patients, each with a single malignant polyp, were investigated. Patients with a macroscopically evident malignant polyp and those in whom the endoscopist reported incomplete polypectomy were excluded from the study. Postpolypectomy morbidity was 4%, and postoperative was 14%. In only 39 cases were the resection margins adjudged to be tumour-free. Histology following subsequent surgery or the follow-up examinations revealed a local recurrence or residual carcinoma at the polypectomy site in only three (2.8%) cases and lymph node metastasis in eight (7.6%) cases. Five patients had remnant adenoma at the polypectomy site. Of the high-risk factors, histological incomplete removal (n = 66, p = 0.04, odds ratio (OR) 10.2) and lymph vessel infiltration (n = 7, p = 0.02, OR 9.2) revealed a significant correlation with lymph node metastasis, but not with remnant tumour. In the case of sessile polyp, the assessment of histological incomplete removal was highly significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (n = 55, p = 0.007, OR 18.1). Polypectomy artefacts appear to be responsible for the discrepancy between histology and the tumour remnants actually present. On the other hand, histologically incompletely removed sessile malignant polyps represent an appreciably higher risk for lymph node metastasis. Such cases should, therefore, be submitted to further oncological resection.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.