Abstract

This chapter concerns the concept of individual freedom, the relationship between the concept of freedom and the concept of autonomy, and the relationship between an agent’s freedom of choice and that agent’s values. It begins a search, continued in the following chapter, for a specific conception of freedom which is fit to play the role of a guiding moral and political value. After examining the negative concept of freedom—freedom from constraint—it considers the question of whether any other concept of freedom is necessary or useful. Both Isaiah Berlin’s attempt to formulate a positive concept of freedom, and more recent attempts to define “third” concepts of freedom, are found to collapse into specific aspects of a suitably general negative concept. John Christman’s argument that the concept of autonomy is a positive concept of freedom is then critiqued, and sufficient reason is found for keeping the two concepts distinct. The chapter concludes with a critique of Matthew Kramer’s attempt to provide a value-neutral account of the extent of an individual’s freedom.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.