Abstract

This chapter discusses the validity of Michael Porter’s framework in explaining Japanese industrial development. In The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael Porter attempts to establish a theoretical framework through the careful observation of various and extensive facts and, by this inductive method, he seeks to explain the international competitiveness of firms. Porter sees his task as the need ‘to explain the pattern of success and failure in industries and how this has been changing over time’, and the necessity of understanding the formation of a value chain in particular Japanese industries. The rise and decline of a series of industries from 1970 to the mid-1980s can be understood in terms of a shift of competition from lower production costs as a consequence of labour factors to that of lower costs gained through value chains, not necessarily as a shift from factor cost advantage to product differentiation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.