The CII500K, the beginning of the hydrogeological transition

In this article, environmental and climate practices in science and natural history museums in Türkiye are presented and discussed. While environmental and climate problems are global issues, they have local roots. As environmental issues are related to human activities and museums play a societal role, it is important to examine practices and approaches of museums in relation to the environment. Operations and practices of natural history and science museums in Türkiye, including educational activities, are important elements in communicating the risks of vulnerable environmental issue. This study outlines the environmental practices of the science and natural history museums of Türkiye which are commonly accepted as reliable providers of information to engage with audiences for action towards environmental challenges. Documentary research was conducted for the study. When the environmental practices and approaches are reviewed, it is seen that natural history museums function basically as research areas. Still, they have public education roles and organize educational activities about natural history, biodiversity and environment. While public education is one of the roles of natural history museums besides their conventional functions like collecting, conserving, researching and exhibiting, science centers are institutions dedicated to public education. Since science centers are mostly supported by municipalities, it can be said that they operate in a more sustainable and holistic way. Also, it is seen that their environmental reach-out programs offer a wider range. Based on data, we claim that collaboration with municipalities has an effect on the environmental activities and perspectives of museums. Also, climate-context works encourage museum community to make interdisciplinary works across the world. By presenting the current environmental and climate practices in natural history and science museums in Türkiye, it is aimed that the article can provide collaboration among institutions and advance the discussions among museums in the context of environment and climate.

Museum visitors and non-visitors in Germany: A representative survey

Recommandations pour la pratique clinique

This study was carried out to gauge the current status of natural history collection centres in Malaysia, primarily focused on animal collections. Part of the research is reported here and it constituted objective one which is to compare the status of natural history collection between the various centres in Malaysia and also with three selected Southeast Asian tropical region museums in trying to understand need of the Malaysian public for a natural history museum. It maps out the locations, describes the number and kinds of specimens kept at each collection centre. Financial and governance aspects are also described. In total 11 centres were visited all over Malaysia. These collection centres and museums were managed by federal or state government or universities. Duration of visit at each location ranged from one to seven days. During the visit interviews were carried out with collection manager to obtained Questionnaire was also left behind for managers of centre to fill in and sent back to researchers. In addition, three natural history collection centres and museums in South East Asia tropical region were also visited: Bogor Zoological Museum, Indonesia; Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Singapore and Mahachakri Sirindhorn Natural History Museum, Prince of Songkhla University, Thailand. Following the same protocol as with Malaysian centres, the information obtained enable researcher to make comparison between Malaysia and those in the region. This paper found that most of the natural history museums and collection centres were focused in the centre of peninsular Malaysia. However, natural history collections in Malaysia are still limited by state and national borders. Coordination and integration of these centres, currently runned separately by the federal, state governments, research institutions and institution of higher learning, is seen as the way forward to provide for a strong basis of understanding biodiversity among the Malaysian public.

Prof. Arthur Looss (1861-1923) was a prolific German parasitologist, who, among other things, authored descriptions of 22 new species of nematodes and 115 new species of trematodes. After his death, his collection (including type material) was split between several institutions: Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington (USA), Natural History Museum in Berlin and the Natural History Museum in Leipzig (Germany), Gothenburg Museum of Natural History and Swedish Museum of Natural History (Sweden). Here we revise all type specimens of nematodes from the A. Looss collection that are currently preserved in the Swedish Museum of Natural History (Strongylus subtilis, Sclerostomum edentatum, S. vulgare, Cyathostomum labratum, C. coronatum, C. bicoronatum, C. calicatum, C. alveatum, C. catinatum, C. nassatum, C. radiatum, C. elongatum, C. auriculatum, Triodontus minor, T. serratus, C. labiatum and Uncinaria polaris), designate and describe lectotypes wherever deemed necessary and provide catalogue access numbers to all type materials. We also revise all notes and drawings associated with new species that A. Looss described and provide previously unpublished pencilled sketches and ink print-ready drawings of some of these species (Strongylus subtilis, Cyathostomum poculatum, C. radiatum, C. elongatum, C. calicatum, C. auriculatum, Triodontus serratus, Trichostrongylus vitrinus and possibly Necator africanus).

Gordon John Howes 1938-2013 (Fish Systematist)

Natural history museums are unique spaces for interdisciplinary research and for educational innovation. Through extensive exhibits and public programming and by hosting rich communities of amateurs, students, and researchers at all stages of their careers, they provide a place-based window to focus on integration of science and discovery, as well as a locus for community engagement. At the same time, like a synthesis radio telescope, when joined together through emerging digital resources, the global community of museums (the ‘Global Museum’) is more than the sum of its parts, allowing insights and answers to diverse biological, environmental, and societal questions at the global scale, across eons of time, and spanning vast diversity across the Tree of Life. We argue that, whereas natural history collections and museums began with a focus on describing the diversity and peculiarities of species on Earth, they are now increasingly leveraged in new ways that significantly expand their impact and relevance. These new directions include the possibility to ask new, often interdisciplinary questions in basic and applied science; inform biomimetic design; and even provide solutions to climate change, global health and food security challenges. As institutions, they are incubators for cutting-edge research in biology and simultaneously protect core infrastructure for present and future societal needs. In this perspective, we discuss challenges to the realization of the full potential of natural history collections and museums to serve society. After reviewing collections and types of museums, including local and global efforts, we discuss the value of specimens and the importance of observations. We then focus on mapping and modelling of museum data (including place-based approaches and discovery), and explore the main projects, platforms and databases enabling this. We also explore ways in which improved infrastructure will allow higher quality science and increased opportunities for interdisciplinary research and communication, as well as new uses of collections. Finally, we aim to improve relevant protocols for the long-term storage of specimens and tissues, ensuring proper connection with tomorrow’s technologies and hence further increasing the relevance of natural history museums.

In 1844, the celebrated Dutch author Everhardus Johannes Potgieter (1808-1875) published his criticism of the Rijksmuseum (national museum) in De Gids , which at the time was the most important cultural periodical. The chapter describes the exceptional situation in the Netherlands regarding history and art - and thus museums - and sketch the history of the Dutch national art museums in Amsterdam and The Hague until 1844. The first national museum - the Nationale Konst-Gallerij (national art gallery) - opened its doors in May 1800. It was housed in the west wing of a former palace of the princes of Orange, Huiten Bosch (house in the wood), near The Hague. During the Kingdom of Holland (1806-1810) - under Louis Napoleon, the brother of Napoleon - the national museum's collection was moved from The Hague to Amsterdam, where it was housed on the third floor of the Royal Palace and called the Royal Museum. Keywords: Amsterdam; De Gids ; Everhardus Johannes Potgieter; Louis Napoleon; national museum; Nationale Konst-Gallerij; Rijksmuseum; Royal Museum; The Hague

This study aims to investigate visitor perception on the interactive digital exhibits (IDE) for learning cultural heritage and history. It further identifies possible ways IDE may help in order to improve visitor learning experience during their visit to historical and cultural heritage institutions. Four related institutions were selected in this study: Taman Tamadun Islam (TTI) and Architectural Museum Malaysia (AMM) which display architectural wonders of past civilizations by means of large replicas; as well as National Museum (NM) and Museum of History and Ethnography (MHE) which are dedicated to safeguarding and preserving the national heritage and history. TTI and NM have adequate general information technology infrastructure and digital exhibits are installed in their exhibition halls. AMM and MHE have less digital exhibits and most exhibits consist of a mixture of posters, artefacts, and replica. During this study, a survey was conducted by means of interview with 311 respondents who are also visitors to these four institutions. The findings of this study suggest most visitors perceived the use of IDE in general will allow easy access to information on national history and cultural heritage. They recommended IDE to be used as interpretation methods in order to make national history and cultural heritage more attractive. Interestingly, when it comes to available exhibition techniques, visitors vary their preferences on IDE over traditional means of exhibits according to the nature of these institutions. These findings reflect that museum visitors welcome the use of IDE and nevertheless appreciate the aesthetic values of real artefacts.

Sceloporus adleri, a new species founded on 41 specimens, is related to the geographically adjacent species S. formosus, and is presumably limited to the Sierra Madre del Sur, Guerrero, Mexico. This Sierra appears to possess sufficient biotic endemism to justify recognition as a distinctive biotic province. Among specimens secured in Guerrero, Mexico, by Kraig Adler and his group during the winter of 1969, are 12 of a remarkably colorful species of Sceloporus cryptically related to S. formosus Wiegmann. Several other specimens of the same species had been secured by Adler earlier in the same area, and an additional series was secured for us in 1972 by David M. Dennis. We name this population Sceloporus adleri sp. nov. Holotype.-University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ) 131689, a male, taken at Asoleadero, Guerrero, Mexico, 2520 m, on 17 December 1969, by Kraig Adler, David M. Dennis and David H. Snyder. Field no. MN 4466. Paratypes.-Forty, all from Guerrero, including UMMZ 126282 (5, field nos. IJ 1522-6), Cerro Teotepec (ca. 125 km by road W Xochipala), 3300-3400 m., 10 August 1964, Theodore J. Cohn and Jean Cohn; UMMZ 130134 (6, field nos. GH 9264-7, 9270-1), between Puerto Chico and Asoleadero, 2550-2600 m, 13-14 June 1964, Kraig Adler, Guy G. Musser and James H. Brown; Colorado University Museum (CUM) 50651-3, 5 km E Escalerillo, 2460 m, 20 December 1972, David M. Dennis, David H. Snyder, Mike Silvey, Don F. Harker; Field Museum of Natural History 191335-6, U.S. National Museum (USNM) 193236, University of Illinois Museum of Natural History 93532, all topoparatypes, 16 December 1969; Kansas University Museum of Natural History (KUMNH) 143612, CUM 46010, Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ) 129779, Brigham Young Univ. Mus. 40188, American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) 108211, California Academy of Science 133089, all topoparatypes, 17 December 1969; British Museum (Natural History) 1971.1856, ca. 3km (by road) E Puerto Gallo, 2740 m, 19 December 1969; CUM 50636-50, 2415 m; all topoparatypes, 19 December 1972, David M. Dennis, David H. Snyder, Mike Silvey, Don F. Harker. Twenty (USNM, KUMNH, CUM 46010, 50639-42, 50644, 50646-7, 50649, 50652, MCZ, AMNH, UMMZ field nos. 1522-3, 1526, 9264-5, 9270) are males; all others (20) are females. Collectors are Kraig Adler, David M. Dennis and David H. Snyder, unless otherwise noted. Definition.-A Sceloporus of the formosus group, distinguished from other members by the following combination of characters: mean dorsal scales 38.4; mean ventral scales 49.4; mean scales around midbody 43.7; mean femoral pores 13.3; mean scales between femoral pore series 12.8; median frontonasal in contact with lateral frontonasals; supraoculars generally not distinctly wider than long and generally not in contact with median head scales; scales on posterior surface of thigh relatively small; an incomplete, posteriorly light-bordered black nuchal collar; a pair of dorsolateral light stripes (obscure in large males); tan to dark brown dorsally in *Present address: Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.

ABSTRACTNatural history museums function as pedagogical showrooms for science. They operate within the contemporary framework of the biological sciences—presented as secular, value‐free, and devoid of social influence. However, I argue the practice of preserving and displaying bodies carries not only an epistemological lineage but also an ontological one. In this paper, I consider the function of preserved bodies in both Catholicism and natural history museums, exploring correlations in their respective developments, methods of collection, documentation, and presentation, as well as the contexts of relationality between human people and nonhuman dead bodies. Through this examination, I argue that, much like the fragmentary remains of saints, these reconstructed nonhuman bodies manifest a new kind of relic, weaving together the past and present through their own special powers of resurrection, reconstitution, and miraculous healing through the engagement with materiality.

The evolution of a great mind: the life and work of Darwin

Natural history museums are unique spaces for interdisciplinary research and educational innovation. Through extensive exhibits and public programming and by hosting rich communities of amateurs, students, and researchers at all stages of their careers, they can provide a place-based window to focus on integration of science and discovery, as well as a locus for community engagement. At the same time, like a synthesis radio telescope, when joined together through emerging digital resources, the global community of museums (the ‘Global Museum’) is more than the sum of its parts, allowing insights and answers to diverse biological, environmental, and societal questions at the global scale, across eons of time, and spanning vast diversity across the Tree of Life. We argue that, whereas natural history collections and museums began with a focus on describing the diversity and peculiarities of species on Earth, they are now increasingly leveraged in new ways that significantly expand their impact and relevance. These new directions include the possibility to ask new, often interdisciplinary questions in basic and applied science, such as in biomimetic design, and by contributing to solutions to climate change, global health and food security challenges. As institutions, they have long been incubators for cutting-edge research in biology while simultaneously providing core infrastructure for research on present and future societal needs. Here we explore how the intersection between pressing issues in environmental and human health and rapid technological innovation have reinforced the relevance of museum collections. We do this by providing examples as food for thought for both the broader academic community and museum scientists on the evolving role of museums. We also identify challenges to the realization of the full potential of natural history collections and the Global Museum to science and society and discuss the critical need to grow these collections. We then focus on mapping and modelling of museum data (including place-based approaches and discovery), and explore the main projects, platforms and databases enabling this growth. Finally, we aim to improve relevant protocols for the long-term storage of specimens and tissues, ensuring proper connection with tomorrow’s technologies and hence further increasing the relevance of natural history museums.

Our study has been based upon a total of 138 specimens, more than twice as many as Taylor (1936) had available. These have been made available through the courtesy of Mr. Bryce C. Brown, Dr. Doris Cochran, Mr. Harold A. Dundee, Dr. Howard K. Gloyd, Dr. Norman Hartweg, Mr. J. E. Johnson, Mr. A. J. Kirn, Mr. Arthur Loveridge, Mr. M. Graham Netting, Dr. A. I. Ortenburger, Mr. Clifford H. Pope, Mr. Floyd Potter, Mr. L. W. Ramsey, Mr. K. P. Schmidt and Dr. Edward H. Taylor. Abbreviations for museum or personal collections are: AJK, Alvin J. Kirn; B.U., Baylor University, Strecker Museum; CAS, Chicago Academy of Sciences; CM, Carnegie Museum; CNHM, Chicago Natural History Museum; EHT, Edward H. Taylor; FP, Floyd Potter; HAD, Harold A. Dundee; LWR, Leo W. Ramsey; MCZ, Museum of Comparative Zoology; MZUM, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan; UIMNH, University of Illinois Museum of Natural History; UKMNH, University of Kansas Museum of Natural History: UOMZ, University of Oklahoma Museum of Zoology; USNM, United States National Museum. We have in addition received notes on the natural

Zoologica ScriptaVolume 52, Issue 3 p. 185-186 EDITORIAL Lutz Bachmann, Corresponding Author Lutz Bachmann [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-2074 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Correspondence Lutz Bachmann, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPer G. P. Ericson, Per G. P. Ericson orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-9998 The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorHege Vårdal, Hege Vårdal orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-6177 The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author Lutz Bachmann, Corresponding Author Lutz Bachmann [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-2074 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Correspondence Lutz Bachmann, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPer G. P. Ericson, Per G. P. Ericson orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-9998 The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorHege Vårdal, Hege Vårdal orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-6177 The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author First published: 03 April 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12594Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. Volume52, Issue3May 2023Pages 185-186 RelatedInformation