Abstract
The "democratic ideal"-the belief that any American, regardless of background, can attend college-is fully woven into the fabric of America's higher-education system. Historically, state colleges were the embodiment of this ideal. Yet, the democratic rhetoric did not always match the selective reality in terms of who attended state universities, especially around the turn of the 20th century. This study reveals that the University of Michigan, despite the impassioned rhetoric of its president, James Burrill Angell, had become increasingly elite and expensive by 1910. As a result, fewer students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds were able to attend. The university's rhetorical commitment to the poor; however, took another route as an increasingly research-oriented faculty began studying poverty and its related problems rather than admitting individual poor students.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.