The Characterization of Social Media in Orthopaedic Surgery
Background:There is a paucity of information regarding the use of social media by both orthopaedic residents and applicants. Therefore, this investigation aimed to (1) characterize the use of social media by current orthopaedic surgery residents and applicants to an orthopaedic surgery residency and (2) evaluate the influence of social media on applicants to an orthopaedic surgery residency.Methods:An anonymous, nationwide survey was conducted among current orthopaedic surgery residents and fourth-year medical students applying to the authors' orthopaedic surgery. Survey data included demographics, social media usage preferences, social media engagement, and the influence of social media on applicants' perception of and decision to apply to residency programs.Results:Three hundred twelve surveys were completed, which included 170 resident surveys and 142 applicant surveys. Two hundred thirty-seven of the respondents (76%) use social media daily. Two hundred fourteen respondents (72%) have listened to orthopaedic surgery podcasts. Regarding educational social media posts, 81% of the residents and 57% of the applicants preferred case presentations with corresponding imaging; for noneducational posts, 89% of the applicants preferred content involving resident life outside the hospital. When asked how much an orthopaedic residency program's social media presence influenced application decision (on a scale of 0-10, 0 being no influence and 10 being the most influence), the mean response was 3.47 among all respondents.Conclusions:Most survey respondents use social media daily, have listened to orthopaedic podcasts, find case presentations with corresponding imaging the most useful format for educational posts, and prefer to see residency programs post about resident life outside of the hospital. A residency program's social media presence did not significantly influence applicants' decision to apply to a specific program; however, there was a trend toward increasing influence with more recent applicants. Future research should further investigate social media's impact on the residency application process and the influence of social media on orthopaedic applicants and residents.
- Research Article
23
- 10.2106/jbjs.oa.22.00116
- Jan 1, 2023
- JBJS Open Access
The American Medical Association Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to identify all allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs during the 2021 to 2022 academic year. The number of female residents and interns; the number of female faculty, professors, and associate professors; and the number of women in leadership positions were compared with data from the academic year 2016 to 2017. Continuous data were analyzed with independent t-tests, and significance was set at p < 0.05. A total of 696 female residents (19.2%) were identified from 3,624 orthopaedic residents, an increase from 13.5% in 2016. Programs in the top quartile of female residents had 3 times the number of female residents per program when compared to other quartiles and almost double the number of female interns per program. Programs in the top quartile of female residents had a significantly greater number of female faculty per program than the lower quartiles; 5.76 vs. 4.18. Compared with 2016 to 2017, there were significant increases in female faculty per program from 2.77 to 4.54 along with female full professors from 0.274 to 0.694. These increases contribute to the overall growth in the number of women in leadership positions per program over the past 5 years to 1.01 from 0.35 (p < 0.001). In the past 5 years, the percentage of female residents has increased from 13.5% to 19.2%. Furthermore, women make up 22.1% of interns. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs with higher percentages of female faculty had higher numbers of female residents. By encouraging programs to promote female representation within leadership and residents, we may continue to see the gap in orthopaedic sex diversity close. III.
- Research Article
- 10.7759/cureus.76914
- Jan 4, 2025
- Cureus
Introduction In recent years, medical students and residents across the country have begun to utilize social media as a tool to connect. With more access to technology than ever before, medical students are using residency social media pages to find out more information about the culture of residency programs. Global pandemics, such as COVID-19, assisted in precipitating these changes in resident recruitment efforts due to truncated in-person interactions and limited sub-internship rotations. Additionally, the transition to virtual interviews further pushed medical students to find new ways to connect with residency programs. In response, orthopedic residency programs increased their social media presence to share information and facilitate virtual interactions with applicants. Our goal was to determine the platforms and content most influential for applicants choosing orthopedic surgery residency programs to assess the changing landscape of social media utilization. Methodology Applicants to a single academic orthopedic surgery residency program from 2017 to 2022 were surveyed. Participants were asked to describe personal use of social media, encounters with residency programs on social media, and perceptions of the social media presence and content of orthopedic surgery residency programs.Surveys were distributed to participants via email including a description of the study requesting voluntary participation. Each subject received, at most, one reminder email. The data was analyzed to determine applicant perceptions of the social media presence of Orthopedic Surgery residency programs. Results The survey was distributed to 3690 applicants to Penn State's Orthopedic Surgery Residency Program from the entering class of 2018-2022 in addition to the 19 Penn State fourth-year medical students applying to Orthopedics. A total of 102 people responded to the survey, with a response rate of 3.1%. Of the total number of respondents,88.2% thought Instagram was the best platform for a residency program to use, and over 65% of respondents would use Instagram to interact with a residency program. Most respondents prefer Resident Biographies, Social Gatherings/Family Life, Day-in-the-Life, Program Culture, and Attending Biographies posted on the Instagram page every week. Applicants observed drinking, politics, and sexist language on social media pages of orthopedic surgery residency programs that were undesirable and caused a negative perception of that program. Conclusions Social media usage has drastically increased in recent years. Global pandemics and increased social media usage among the US population have allowed social media platforms to become a powerful tool for marketing orthopedic surgery residency programs. This survey study examined applicant perceptions of the social media presence of orthopedic surgery residency programs. Instagram was the most widely used and influential. According to surveyed participants, programs desiring to create the most positive impact through social media should aim for weekly posts highlighting the people, events, and everyday life of the orthopedic residency while avoiding controversial content that may ostracize applicants.
- Research Article
10
- 10.2106/jbjs.oa.22.00001
- Apr 1, 2022
- JB & JS open access
Background:Social media and online resources have been used in graduate medical education for years. In addition to an official residency program website, many orthopaedic surgery programs have an established social media presence to interact, educate, and engage with prospective applicants. The role of social media in orthopaedic surgery has significantly expanded in recent years. Despite its increasing use, the specific impact of social media on orthopaedic surgery residency applicants remains unknown.Methods:Applicants to the home institution's orthopaedic surgery residency program were sent an optional online survey during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle. No incentive was provided in exchange for participation.Results:Of 812 orthopaedic surgery applicants, 650 (80%) completed the survey. Program-based social media is widely accessed by applicants. Instagram is used by most applicants (61.9%), and nearly a third (28.7%) rely on it as their main resource when researching prospective residency programs. The majority (66.9%) agreed that social media can be successfully used to inform and interact with applicants. Most of the applicants (60.6%) also reported that social media had a positive impact on their perception of the associated program. Only 5.7% of respondents indicated that social media had a negative influence. The most effective uses of social media seem to be in allowing a program to display its culture and transparency.Conclusion:Social media plays a substantial role in the orthopaedic surgery residency application process, and its use continues to grow. Programs can use it to effectively engage with and inform prospective applicants. The impact of social media is positive on most of the applicants. Instagram is the preferred social media platform used by applicants, and nearly one-third rely on it as their main resource when researching programs. Investing time and resources into a social media presence seems to be a worthwhile pursuit for orthopaedic surgery programs as an important piece to a well-rounded recruitment effort of modern orthopaedic surgery applicants.
- Supplementary Content
19
- 10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00083
- Dec 21, 2021
- JBJS Open Access
Introduction:Owing to the coronavirus 2019 pandemic limiting both applicants and residency programs in their ability to connect in-person, it is likely that a shift toward virtual connections was made. We aimed to query applicants regarding their perspectives of orthopaedic residency program social media use. Furthermore, we aimed to quantify the number of orthopaedic surgery residency programs with active social media accounts.Methods:All applicants to a single orthopaedic surgery residency were surveyed regarding their perceptions of social media use by orthopaedic surgery residency programs. After this, we evaluated social media use by orthopaedic surgery residency programs.Results:Of total, 54.3% of applicants indicated that an orthopaedic surgery residency program they followed on social media posted content that increased their interest in the program. Furthermore, 77.8% of the applicants believed that orthopaedic surgery residency programs should have social media accounts, specifically Instagram. Of the orthopaedic surgery residencies identified, 113 (58.9%) had Instagram, 84 (43.8%) had Twitter, and 21 (10.9%) had Facebook accounts.Discussion:Applicants largely feel that orthopaedic surgery residencies should have social media accounts. Orthopaedic surgery residencies saw the value in connecting with students virtually, as shown by nearly 90% of the programs, with social media starting their accounts this year.
- Research Article
9
- 10.5312/wjo.v13.i8.693
- Aug 18, 2022
- World Journal of Orthopedics
BACKGROUNDIn the Spring of 2020, residency programs across the country experienced rapid and drastic changes to their application process as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In response, residency programs shifted to virtual events and began harnessing social media to communicate with applicants.AIMTo analyze the changes in social media usage by orthopaedic surgery programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.METHODSBased on the 2019 residency and fellowship electronic database, accredited US orthopaedic surgery programs were reviewed for social media presence on Instagram and Twitter. Approximately 47000 tweets from 2011-2021 were extracted through the Twitter application programming interface. We extracted: Total number of followers, accounts following, tweets, likes, date of account creation, hashtags, and mentions. Natural language processing was utilized for tweet sentiment analysis and classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Instagram data was collected and deemed current as of August 11, 2021. The account foundation date analysis was based on the date recognized as the start of the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States, before or after March 1, 2020.RESULTSA total of 85 (42.3%) orthopaedic surgery residency program Twitter handles were identified. Thirty-five (41.2%) programs joined Twitter in the nine months after the 2020 covid outbreak. In 2020, there was a 126.6% increase in volume of tweets by orthopaedic surgery residency accounts as compared to 2019. The median number of followers was 474.5 (interquartile range 205.0-796.5). The account with the highest number of tweets was Hospital for Special Surgery (@HSpecialSurgery) with 13776 tweets followed by University of Virginia (@UVA_Ortho) with 5063 and Yale (@OrthoAtYale) with 899. Sentiment analysis before 2020 revealed 30.4% positive, 60.8% neutral, and 8.8% negative sentiments across tweets. Interestingly, the positive sentiment percentage increased in 2020 from 30.4% to 34.5%. Of the 201 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic residency programs on Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database, 115 (57.2%) participate on Instagram, with 101 (87.8%) identified as “resident”-managed vs 14 (12.2%) identified as “department”-managed. Over three quarters (77.4%) of Instagram accounts were created after March 1, 2020. The average number of followers per account was 1089.5 with an average of 58.9 total posts. CONCLUSIONOur study demonstrates a substantial growth of Instagram and Twitter presence by orthopaedic surgery residency programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. These data suggest that orthopaedic residency programs have utilized social media as a new way to communicate with applicants and showcase their programs in light of the challenges presented by the pandemic.
- Research Article
98
- 10.2106/jbjs.19.00930
- Jan 6, 2020
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
The current U.S. orthopaedic residency application process is becoming increasingly impersonal in the wake of an increasing number of applications. Through an analysis of orthopaedic surgery residency application statistics, we have highlighted the effect that the number of orthopaedic applications has on match rate, and we have suggested methods for a more personalized application process. Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) for United States orthopaedic residency applicants from 2008 to 2018 were collected. These data included the average number of applications submitted per applicant, the average number of applications received per program, the total number of residency positions offered in the U.S., the total number of U.S. applicants, and the total number of U.S. applicants who matched to a U.S. orthopaedic surgery residency program. U.S. applicant match rates and the average number of applications received per residency position offered were calculated. Linear regression models were used to determine the rate at which these variables changed over time. The average number of applications submitted by an applicant increased from 46.5 in 2008 to 74.9 in 2018. The average number of applications received per residency position offered increased from 54.1 in 2008 to 85.7 in 2018. The number of U.S. applicants was 740 in 2008 and 849 in 2018. The number of U.S. orthopaedic residency programs only slightly increased from 160 in 2008 to 171 in 2018. The match rate for U.S. medical school applicants has remained stable from 2008 to 2018 at a mean of 76.9% and a standard deviation of 2.3%. The match rate has remained stable from 2008 to 2018 despite an increase in the number of applications per position. This discrepancy suggests that increasing the number of submitted applications may not correlate with applicant success. We address this discrepancy and suggest methods that can potentially allow for a more targeted orthopaedic application experience.
- Research Article
16
- 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.004
- Sep 23, 2021
- Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
Social Media Use Continues to Increase Among Orthopaedic Residency Programs in the United States
- Research Article
- 10.1097/bco.0000000000001308
- Apr 21, 2025
- Current Orthopaedic Practice
Background: The American Orthopaedic Association’s Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors implemented a preference signaling program for the 2022-2023 orthopaedic residency application cycle, which allows applicants to send up to 30 “signals” that indicate their specific interest in a program. The stated purpose of the implementation of signaling is to produce “a more equitable, reproducible, efficient, and mutually optimal Match,” and to decrease barriers for applicants from groups that have been underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery. Particularly with the elimination of the USMLE Step 1 score, preference signaling has now become one of the most important factors considered by residency programs when extending interview invitations. This study thus aims to identify any significant effects of signaling on addressing the issue of female representation in successful orthopaedic surgery residency applicants. Methods: Using publicly available data, the gender distribution of orthopaedic surgery residents was obtained for the classes of 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028 for 176 of the 199 (88.44%) recognized US orthopaedic residency programs. Results: When comparing the gender distribution of orthopaedic surgery residents after the implementation of preference signaling, there was no significant change in the proportion of female residents comprising the residency class (P=0.495). Conclusions: In its first year, preference signaling did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on female representation of successful applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. Therefore, other methods of increasing representation in orthopaedic surgery are necessary.
- Research Article
- 10.70709/cxvvfo1qkp
- Apr 17, 2025
- Journal of the American Osteopathic Academy of Orthopedics
Background Matching into competitive surgical specialties, including orthopedic surgery, has been a competitive task for medical students; however, Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) and females are some of the least represented groups in orthopedic surgery residency programs. While females represented nearly 50% of United States medical residents in 2023, they only represented 20.14% of orthopedic surgery residents. Female DO residents comprised less than 2% of orthopedic surgery residents in 2023. As interest in orthopedics rises for all medical students, it is crucial to look at the trends of how underrepresented groups are represented within the field of orthopedic surgery. Objective To determine how female DO graduates fare in the orthopedic surgery residency program selection process from 2020-2023 and to forecast data through 2033. Methods This is an analysis of publicly available data from the National Residency Match Program. Data from the National Residency Match Program was collected from 2020-2023 and included the total number of DO and MD orthopedic surgery applicants, the total number of female applicants, and the number of matched female DO and MD applicants. Additionally, the number of incoming female DO orthopedic surgery residents for the next ten years (2024-2033) was forecasted using a linear regression model, along with their corresponding confidence intervals. Results From 2020 to 2023, female orthopedic surgery residents increased in number (2020-2021: +58; 2021-2022: +61; 2022-2023: +86). Of DO orthopedic residents from 2020 to 2023, there was a steady rise in female DO residents. Female DO residents made up 10.17% of DO orthopedic residents in 2020, 11.09% in 2021, 10.80% in 2022, and 13.21% in 2023. Female DO residents saw a 50.94% increase while MD female residents saw a 28.66% increase from 2020 to 2023. Based on the most recent data from 2020-2023, we are expecting to see 160.71 ± 6.44 female osteopathic orthopedic surgery residents in 2033. The predicted annual percent change between 2023 and 2033 is between + 5% to 10%. Over the 10 years, that would be interpreted to be 8.29 more female DO residents annually. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that female osteopathic students comprise less than 2% of all orthopedic surgery residents. While the total composition of U.S. orthopedic surgery residents has shown an upward trend in female trainees, this value has only risen by 1.54% over four years. We hope that this research study increases awareness of the lack of DO female representation within the field of orthopedic surgery.
- Research Article
80
- 10.1097/corr.0000000000001553
- Aug 1, 2022
- Clinical orthopaedics and related research
Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive but least diverse surgical specialties, with ever-increasing academic achievements (such as test scores) shown by applicants. Prior research shows that white applicants had higher United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores as well as higher odds of Alpha Omega Alpha status compared with Black, Hispanic, and other applicant groups. Yet, it still remains unknown whether differences in application metrics by race/ethnicity sufficiently explain the underrepresentation of certain racial or ethnic minority groups in orthopaedic residency programs. In this study, we sought to determine (1) the relative weight of academic variables for admission into orthopaedic residency, and (2) whether race and gender are independently associated with admission into an orthopedic residency. The Electronic Residency Application System (ERAS) data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) of first-time MD applicants (n = 8966) for orthopaedic surgery residency positions in the United States and of admitted orthopaedic residents (n = 6218) from 2005 to 2014 were reviewed. This dataset is the first and most comprehensive of its kind to date in orthopaedic surgery. Academic metrics, such as USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, number of publications, Alpha Omega Alpha status, volunteer experiences, work experience, as well as race and gender, were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression models. The first model analyzed the association of academic metrics with admission into orthopaedic residency. In the second model, we added race and gender and controlled for metrics of academic performance. To determine how well the models simulated the actual admissions data, we computed the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) including the area under curve (AUC), which measures the model's ability to simulate which applicants were admitted or not admitted, with an AUC = 1.0 representing a perfect simulation. The odds ratio and confidence interval of each variable were computed. When only academic variables were analyzed in the first model, Alpha Omega Alpha status (odds ratio 2.12 [95% CI 1.80 to 2.50]; p < 0.001), the USMLE Step 1 score (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.04]; p < 0.001), the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge score (OR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.02]; p < 0.001), publication count (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.05]; p < 0.001), and volunteer experience (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.04]; p < 0.001) were associated with admissions into orthopaedics while work and research experience were not. This model yielded a good prediction of the results with an AUC of 0.755. The second model, in which the variables of race and gender were added to the academic variables, also had a good prediction of the results with an AUC of 0.759. This model indicates that applicant race, but not gender, is associated with admissions into orthopaedic residency. Applicants from Asian (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.92]), Black (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.51 to 0.77], Hispanic (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.65]), or other race groups (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.55 to 0.77]) had lower odds of admission into residency compared with white applicants. Minority applicants, but not women, have lower odds of admission into orthopaedic surgery residency, even when accounting for academic performance metrics. Changes in the residency selection processes are needed to eliminate the lower admission probability of qualified minority applicants in orthopaedic residency and to improve the diversity and inclusion of orthopaedic surgery. Changes including increasing the diversity of the selection committee, bias training, blinding applications before review, removal of metrics with history of racial disparities from an interviewer's candidate profile before an interview, and use of holistic application review (where an applicants' experiences, attributes, and academic metrics are all considered) can improve the diversity landscape in training. In addition, cultivating an environment of inclusion will be necessary to address these long-standing trends in orthopaedic surgery. Race, but not gender, is associated with the odds of acceptance into orthopaedic surgery residency despite equivalent academic metrics. Changes in residency selection processes are suggested to eliminate the lower admission probability of qualified minority applicants into orthopaedic residency and to improve the diversity and inclusion of orthopaedic surgery.
- Research Article
- 10.1007/s11999-014-3798-0
- Jul 22, 2014
- Clinical orthopaedics and related research
CORR® curriculum--osteopathic and allopathic residency education: Why not the same standards?
- Research Article
14
- 10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00104
- Jan 1, 2021
- JBJS Open Access
Introduction:The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented challenge for orthopaedic surgery residency applicants when away rotations were canceled and interviews were held virtually. The authors hypothesized that (1) Instagram would have more total social media accounts compared with Twitter or Facebook, (2) most social media accounts on all platforms would be created during 2020, and (3) the average number of Instagram followers would be higher among highly ranked programs.Methods:A list of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs (n = 202) that were ranked by reputation was acquired from Doximity. Public Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter profiles of orthopaedic surgery residency programs were identified through a manual search. Variables assessed on each social media platform were all available summary statistics provided by the social media platform. Instagram accounts were categorized into 5 tiers based on numeric reputation ranking, with 40 programs in each tier (except tier 5 with 42 programs). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Goodness-of-fit regression values were calculated for observed trends.Results:One-hundred seventy-four social media accounts were identified. There was a higher percentage of Instagram accounts (66.1%) compared with Facebook (13.2%) or Twitter (20.7%). From 2010 to 2020, an exponential increase (R2 = 0.88) of social media accounts was observed during 2020. Instagram profiles (77.2%, 98/115 [95 in 2020, 3 in 2021]) were created after the cancelation of away rotations in May 2020. Instagram profiles had 1,029 ± 522.4 average followers, more than Facebook and Twitter. Tier 1 residency programs had the largest average follower count with 1,462.4 ± 584.3 followers.Conclusion:Social media presence increased exponentially during 2020. Instagram was the social media platform with the most accounts. Many Instagram accounts were created during 2020, and most were created after away rotations were canceled during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instagram accounts averaged the most followers. Top tier orthopaedic residency programs had a greater number of accounts and average followers than lower tier programs.
- Research Article
104
- 10.2106/jbjs.j.01583
- Jan 1, 2012
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Although women represented 58% of undergraduate students and 48% of medical students in the U.S. in the 2008-2009 academic year, only 13% of orthopaedic residents and only 4% of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Fellows in 2009 were women. Are all orthopaedic surgery programs in the U.S. equal in their ability to attract female medical students and train female orthopaedic surgeons? This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the U.S. train a similar number of female residents. Data for all ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency training programs in the U.S. for five academic years (2004-2005 through 2008-2009) were collected with use of the Graduate Medical Education (GME) Track database. Orthopaedic residency programs in the U.S. do not train women at an equal frequency. In the academic years from 2004-2005 through 2008-2009, forty-five programs had no female residents during at least one of the five academic years reviewed, and nine programs had no female residents during any of the years. More than fifty orthopaedic residency programs in the U.S. had an average of <10% female trainees over the five-year period, and more than ten programs had an average of >20%. There was no significant change in the distribution among these categories over the five years examined (p = 0.234). Significant differences in the representation of women exist among orthopaedic residency training programs in the U.S. Further examination of the characteristics of orthopaedic residency programs that are successful in attracting female residents, particularly the composition of their faculty as role models, will be important in furthering our understanding of how orthopaedic surgery can continue to attract the best and the brightest individuals. Changes in the cultural experiences in programs that have not trained female orthopaedic surgeons, such as an increased number of female faculty, and policies that emphasize diversity may provide a greater opportunity for our orthopaedic profession to attract female medical students.
- Research Article
2
- 10.7759/cureus.22680
- Feb 28, 2022
- Cureus
Objective The importance of online information in the form of residency program websites has been well documented. With the rise of popularity of social media, another potential vital source of online information distribution exists. We aimed to examine the changes in orthopaedic surgery residency program websites and determine the use of social media by these programs.MethodsA list of orthopaedic residency programs was obtained. Websites were then assessed for presence of numerous criteria. The presence of a social media account on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook platforms was then determined.ResultsOne hundred ninety-five websites out of 197 programs were identified. The most commonly present criterion was resident rotation schedule with 187 (96%) listings. Meanwhile, information on virtual sessions for prospective applicants was the least present at 26 (13%). Out of the 33 criteria assessed, websites contained an average of 20.4 criteria. Approximately half of the programs were noted to have a social media presence.ConclusionWebsite utilization and accessibility have improved over time as the importance of online information has continued to grow in the orthopaedic surgery residency application process. In order to increase their online presence, numerous programs have recently created or enhanced the profiles on social media platforms which may reach more users than websites alone.
- Research Article
2
- 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-24-00230
- Oct 16, 2024
- JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
Introduction:This study assesses the accessibility and nature of parental leave policies during orthopaedic surgery residency training after implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (GME) mandate for 6 weeks of paid parental leave effective July of 2022.Materials and Methods:An audit of orthopaedic surgery residency and affiliated GME websites was conducted to assess the accessibility of parental leave policies during the 2023-2024 academic year. Details on length of leave and nature of renumeration during the leave were recorded. Bivariate analyses were conducted to determine residency program characteristics associated with the accessibility of a parental leave policy. Results were compared with a previous analysis during the 2017-2018 academic year.Results:A total of 200 residency programs were evaluated, and 152 had parental leave policies (76.0%). Compared with 2017 to 2018, a similar percentage of parental leave policies were accessible on residency program websites (3.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.777) but fewer were accessible on GME websites (55.5% vs. 80.7%, P < 0.001). More contemporary policies were obtained from program coordinators (18.5% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.003), and more were not available (24.0% vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001). Most policies offered renumeration (86.7%) and leave for 6 weeks in length (75.0%). A higher prevalence of parental leave policy accessibility was found among orthopaedic residency programs with university affiliation (P < 0.001), more faculty members (P = 0.008) and residents (P = 0.017), a higher percentage of female faculty (P = 0.008), affiliation with a top 50 ranked National Institutes of Health–funded orthopaedic surgery department, and accreditation achieved before 2017 to 2018 (P = 0.004).Discussion:Most orthopaedic surgery residency programs do not have accessible parental leave policies on their websites. The new Accreditation Council for GME mandate will require orthopaedic residency programs to provide residents with 6 weeks of paid parental leave during residency training. Accessible policies may be useful to applicants interested in child rearing during orthopaedic residency training.