Abstract

Having no internal borders, what is a border for the European Union (EU)? Which cri-teria does this powerful organization pursue in its decision-making on further expansion: geographical, political, cultural, economic or all of these? What is the profi t of the Union in advancing its external borders to the east? And why to the east and not the south or west across the Atlantic? Does it still mean that there is the reason for enlarging eastward based on the geographical belonging to Europe?1.This paper discusses the expansion of the European Union to the east with the main focus on its political and economic aspects of integration. The fi rst part includes intro-duction to the concept of Europe, historic background about the formation of the united Europe in terms of geography, culture, politics and economy, juxtaposing opinions and viewpoints of different experts and political scientists on “what is Europe?” and what are the core issues of its enlargement. The second and third parts are dedicated to the advan-tages and disadvantages of European Integration for both parties concerned – the EU and the candidate/member state, in the case of the former having its own “demarcation policy” towards certain regions of the continent when it comes to unifi cation. And the fourth part is about the communication and miscommunication of the informative bodies of the Euro-pean Union that are responsible for public awareness on any process that goes on within the European family. The lack of information results in the ignorance of citizens of Euro-pean and partner countries, which, of course, refl ects on the further processes of expansion on the political level and cultural perception and mentality on the social level.The conclusion sums up the research, and the bibliography lists the books, articles, monographs and Internet sources used in the course of the study.

Highlights

  • This paper discusses the expansion of the European Union to the east with the main focus on its political and economic aspects of integration

  • The question is what are the benefits of the European Union when financing the democratization of the Eastern Partnership countries? What is the main aim of this superpower to close its official borders on the geographical Eastern Europe and the Caucasus, making these countries a bridge separating it from Russia? Does the EU fear Russia, considering these six countries a safety zone or it is a strategic approach of increasing the economic profit through more or less cheap import and export or cheaper labor force without formally having a single market with these countries?

  • The Communication Strategy mainly emphasizes the importance of communication on the online platform based on the fact that it is more effective and cheaper, it does not take into account that not every citizen will go to the website of the European Commission to check the information on the enlargement process, unless he/she has a personal or professional interest in the overall procedure, they depend on the information provided through media coverage, which holds true especially for those levels of political system that are perceived as “far away” (Maier, Rittberger, 2008, p. 243-267) from everyday life

Read more

Summary

The Concept of Enlarged Europe

The history of EU expansion is rather new, since the Union itself does not have a long history, the historians would argue this point bringing forward the. Jensen and Tim Richardson set out the idea of the nature of the “European project” and the meaning of contemporary political integration, drawing out issues for spatial policy making as well as sociological and geographical theories, which they call “a cultural sociology of space” (Jensen, Richardson 2004, p.1) The narrative that they introduce to open up perspectives on the making of European space within the policy processes and the EU institutions is the discourse of “Europe as monotopia,” which captures the idea of a one-dimensional (mono) discourse of space and territory (topia/topos) (Jensen, Richardson 2004, p.3-10). Questioning as to what sort of Europe (in spatial terms) is being constructed by the integration to lie at the heart of the new spatial vision and surfaces of the policies of European integration they introduce the “space of monotopia”

Mutual benefits of enlargement
Prioritization and delaying tactics of the EU
Communication and public awareness towards enlargement
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.