Abstract
Recently developed tools of intertextual analysis show that the dialogues in the Book of Job were in effect echoes of major debates in the early to middle Persian Period about the worth and responsibility of the individual in the new Judaism scattering throughout the empire. They expose the fallacy of the “conservative” tendency to apply past truth literally or statically to new realities without first making the necessary adjustments needed to address new problems. The earlier prophetic and deuteronomic arguments why Israel and Judah had been destroyed still served well to explain the national disaster, but the truth of them had to be refocused to apply to the new situation of individual experiences in widely dispersed Judaism. The Joban dialogues may thus have served as guide for Early Jewish debates about the role of the past when contemporized to the present, the critical function of canon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
