Abstract

The auricular surface is often found very well preserved, thus age-related changes in this anatomical area can be important for any set of human remains that require identification under different taphonomic conditions. This study tests the Buckberry and Chamberlain (2002) and Schmitt et al. (2005) methods in predicting the age of individuals in a documented sample from Crete, Greece. Both methods were used to record changes on the auricular surface in a mixed-sex sample of 74 individuals, directly as well as through photographs, by two independent observers. Cohen’s kappa and intra class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used in order to assess inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. Results showed than none of the methods predicted age with sufficient accuracy, as high error rates were recorded. The Schmitt et al. (2005) method performed better, mainly because the age ranges it uses are broader. Scoring through photographs does not seem to introduce bias in predicting age, as demonstrated by the high intra-observer agreement rates. Inter-observer agreement was also high. The low intra- and inter-observer error rates suggest that the poor performance of both methods in the Cretan sample is not due to a lack of clarity in the description of the morphological changes recorded on the auricular surface; rather it should be attributed to a poor correlation between these changes and age at death in our material.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.