Abstract

A series of three studies was designed to test the astrological doctrine of ‘aspects’. In the first, a group of astrologers was asked to specify how personality varies with specific aspects between 32 pairs of planets; these predictions were tested against scores on 10 personality dimensions. In the second, a comparison of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ aspects was made using multivariate methods. The third study ignored the traditional aspects and simply investigated whether personality varies in any manner as a function of the angular separation between planets at birth. No evidence for the validity of astrological ideas was found in any of these studies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.