Abstract

Background: It is challenging to measure BMI accurately in population studies because it is an expensive and time-consuming task. As a result, subjectively measured BMI, calculated from self-reported height and weight, which we know to be inaccurate, is often used. The purpose of this study is to determine whether using a different, subjective method of measuring BMI, BMI self-selection, would be more accurate. BMI self-selection is determined by asking participants to place themselves in one of the BMI categories, underweight, normal weight, overweight or obese. Methods: A quantitative survey conducted in the outpatient departments of two hospitals in the South West of Ireland. Participants >18 years were included. Pregnant women were excluded. The final sample included 70 participants. Survey completion, including self-reported height and weight and BMI self-selection, preceded the objectively measured weight and height. Demographic and lifestyle factors were also recorded. Results: 59% of the sample were overweight or obese –63% of females and 54% of males. The sensitivity for correct BMI self-selection for normal weight, overweight and obese categories was 90%, 36% and 33% respectively. The sensitivity for BMI categories calculated from self-reported height and weight was 83%, 57% and 59% respectively. In analysis, age, regular alcohol consumption, unhealthy diet and lower levels of physical activity were all associated with underestimation of BMI. Conclusion: BMI self-selection is an accurate tool when used with normal weight individuals but shows poorer ability to demonstrate accurate measurement in overweight and obese BMI categories. It is inferior to the traditional self-reported BMI method for measuring BMI levels in the general population. Presently, we recommend continuing with self-reported BMI for BMI measurement in large population studies. However, further testing of BMI classification in larger studies is suggested and investigation into alternative objective methods of measurement is warranted.

Highlights

  • Ireland has one of the highest rates of overweight and obesity worldwide[1], with only 40% of the population recorded as normal weight in 20152

  • There have been numerous studies examining the role of self-reported body mass index (BMI), defined as using self-reported height and weight to calculate BMI, compared to objectively measured BMI (BMI calculated from measured height and weight)

  • Descriptive characteristics A total of 78 participants were recruited; six were excluded due to incomplete data; two subjects had an objectively measured BMI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ireland has one of the highest rates of overweight and obesity worldwide[1], with only 40% of the population recorded as normal weight in 20152. It has previously been stated that self-reported height is over estimated, regardless of gender, and self-reported weight is under estimated, by both men and women[4,10,12,13,14], resulting in lower BMI self-recordings. This is the case in Ireland [6,8,9]. Conclusion: BMI self-selection is an accurate tool when used with normal weight individuals but shows poorer ability to demonstrate accurate measurement in overweight and obese BMI categories. We recommend continuing with self-reported BMI for BMI measurement in large

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.