Abstract

The flow distribution in the rectangular channel of a laboratory filter-press electrochemical reactor was evaluated using three flow models namely: (a) axial dispersion, (b) sum of two phases and (c) fast and stagnant zones. In the case of the axial-dispersion model, several methods have been used to calculate the Peclet number; the moment method, the non-linear least-squares and the Laplace transform technique. Several boundary conditions, involving different physical and experimental assumptions of the flow were used to solve the partial differential equation that describes the flow behaviour. A total of nine expressions to examine flow dispersion has been used. The comparison of experimental and predicted response signals was made by evaluating the root mean squared error. A data fit in real time has been found to be a better choice as solutions based on the evaluation of moments are prone to error due the overweight of the signal at long times. Data fitting in the Laplace plane is very accurate but it does not guarantee a good fit in real time. Models based on the sum of a fast and a slow or stagnant phase resulted in solutions having very low values of the extension of the slow and stagnant phases, the assumption of a single phase with some degree of dispersion was considered more appropriate.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.