Abstract

The postmodern turn in psychotherapy has fastened on the value for therapy of postmodemism's antirealist/ constructivist philosophy—that knowers make rather than discover reality, and therefore all knowledge is inescapably relative or subjective. In this article I argue that therapists have seized on postmodern antirealism in an attempt to individualise practice, but that antirealism is irrelevant to that goal. To individualize therapy, therapists need a clearer understanding of the structure of the theoretical systems they use to guide their practice. In particular, so-called postmodern therapy systems are structured to enhance the indnridualizatlon of practice, but at the expense of achieving a systematic practice. Moreover, postmodernism has other consequences for therapy that should be considered and empirically assessed before ft is declared the solution to psychotherapy's recalcitrant problems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.