Abstract

PurposeWhen people migrate to new cultures, they adapt to their new culture while at the same time retaining the norms of their original culture. The phenomenon whereby migrants adapt to the cultural norms of a host culture has been referred to as acculturation. Using a mock witness paradigm, we examined the acculturation effect in the eyewitness memory reports of sub‐Saharan African migrants in Western Europe.MethodsWe sampled sub‐Saharan African migrants in Western Europe, as well as sub‐Saharan Africans living in Africa as a control group (total N = 107). The mock witnesses were shown stimuli scenes of crimes in African and Western European settings and provided free and cued recall reports about what they had seen.ResultsCentral details were reported more than contextual details by both groups of sub‐Saharan Africans. Relative to the control group of sub‐Saharan Africans living in Africa, sub‐Saharan African migrants in Western Europe provided more correct central details in free recall. The longer migrants had resided in Western Europe, the less collectivistic they become. Migrants also provided more elaborate reports the longer their duration of residence in Western Europe.ConclusionThe findings of the current research suggest the new cultural environment of migrants impact their cultural norms, which may have implications for their eyewitness memory reports.

Highlights

  • Sub-Saharan African migrant mock witnesses (M = .77, SD = .82) reported more incorrect background details than sub-Saharan Africans living in Africa (M = .38, SD = .77)

  • Sub-Saharan African migrants (M = 5.53, SD = 2.19) provided more incorrect central details than sub-Saharan Africans living in Africa did (M = 4.29, SD = 2.24)

  • There were similar amount of unanswered questions by sub-Saharan African migrant mock witnesses and sub-Saharan Africans living in Africa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The setting in which the crime was witnessed had a significant main effect on correct background details reported by mock witnesses in response to cued recall questions, F(1, 105) = 44.11, p < .001, η2p = .30. Mock witnesses reported more incorrect background details for Western European crime settings (M = 5.06, SD = 2.30) than they did for sub-Saharan African crime settings (M = 4.04, SD = 2.30). Sub-Saharan African migrant mock witnesses significantly reported more incorrect background details for Western European crime settings than they did for sub-Saharan African crime settings (p = .001). Sub-Saharan Africans located in Africa, did not differ in incorrect background details reported for both crime settings (p = .30).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.