Abstract
Introduction: Audio description (AD) in museums is crucial for making them accessible for people with visual impairments. Nevertheless, there are limited museum-specific AD guidelines currently available. This research examines current varied international practitioner perspectives on museum AD, focusing on imagery, meaning, emotion and degrees of objectivity, and the regional differences (Europe and United States) in AD traditions, in order to better understand how AD can be used to enhance access to museums. Methods: Forty-two museum describers from 12 countries responded to a questionnaire requiring fixed-choice and free-text responses about the purpose and construction of museum AD. Results: Inference tests showed that European describers agreed more strongly than American describers that AD should “explore meaning” ( U = 91.00 , N1 = 24, N2 = 14, p = .03), and “create an emotional experience” ( U = 89.50, N1 = 24, N2 = 14, p = .03), rating the use of cognitive prompts as more important ( U = 85.50, N1 = 21, N2 = 14, p = .04). Qualitative data enriched this understanding by exploring participant responses on the themes of mental imagery, objectivity and interpretation and cognitive prompts. This highlighted broader agreement between regions on mental imagery, but more acceptance of interpretation in AD from the European respondents. Discussion: American and European describers’ opinions differ regarding the purpose of AD: whether it is about conveying visual information or whether broader interpretations should be incorporated into descriptions for audiences with visual impairments. Implications for practitioners: These findings indicate that further discussion is needed regarding the purpose of museum AD and, in particular, the way in which objectivity is contextualized. They raise questions about AD providing visual information and/or seeking to address a wider museum experience, including the stimulation of curiosity or emotion.
Highlights
Audio description (AD) in museums is crucial for making them accessible for people with visual impairments
The findings suggested that where guidelines agree, for example, on structure and language, international museum AD practices have much in common
The conflicting views between regional approaches to AD emphasize the many different things that AD can aim to do in a museum: provide verbal description of visual elements, create mental imagery, tell a story, explore meaning, and evoke emotions
Summary
Audio description (AD) in museums is crucial for making them accessible for people with visual impairments. Results: Inference tests showed that European describers agreed more strongly than American describers that AD should “explore meaning” (U 1⁄4 91.00, N1 1⁄4 24, N2 1⁄4 14, p 1⁄4 .03), and “create an emotional experience” (U 1⁄4 89.50, N1 1⁄4 24, N2 1⁄4 14, p 1⁄4 .03), rating the use of cognitive prompts as more important (U 1⁄4 85.50, N1 1⁄4 21, N2 1⁄4 14, p 1⁄4 .04). Qualitative data enriched this understanding by exploring participant responses on the themes of mental imagery, objectivity and interpretation and cognitive prompts.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
