Abstract

Adam Schaff was at the front of the ideological campaign organized in post-war Poland during the wave of Stalinization. By attempting to adapt the Soviet “model” of public discussion to Polish academia, Schaff wanted to teach the representatives of the Lvov-Warsaw School of logic how to lead a scholarly debate. Schaff ’s group consisted of young scholars from the Instytut Kształcenia Kadr Naukowych [Institute for Education of Scientific Staff] and with critical reviews on the works of Polish logicians they tried to force their opponents to change the basic principles of their academic practice under the new circumstances. Nevertheless, Schaff ’s project failed since, unlike Soviet scholars, the participants in the discussion referred to different academic virtues that made the adaptation of the Soviet model of public discussion impossible.

Highlights

  • I still cannot get used to the role of an important person who has to make daily decisions on issues that are importantHistory of scientific knowledge to other people

  • By attempting to adapt the Soviet “model” of public discussion to Polish academia, Schaff wanted to teach the representatives of the Lvov-Warsaw School of logic how to lead a scholarly debate

  • Particular autonomy of a scholarship holder, conditional upon following vague slogans of people’s unity, “progressive ideas,” and friendship with the Soviet Union shaped a space both for the reconstruction of the inter-war academic traditions destroyed by World War II, and for a certain optimism concerning the opportunity to use the new conditions to organize post-war Polish academia in a “more progressive way” than in the Polish Republic before 1939

Read more

Summary

Introduction

I still cannot get used to the role of an important person who has to make daily decisions on issues that are important. The argument of my article is that a special form of public discussion –one that implied public self-criticism of those who became the subjects of public criticism – was an integral part of the Soviet ‘model’ that Schaff “failure” of the project to adapt to the new virtues of the academic discussion resulted in the institutions created by Stalinism becoming bastions of resistance to the principles of “Stalinism” during the wave of de-Stalinisation

Adam Schaff and preparations of a platform for the ‘official’ philosophy
The idealistic character of non-Marxian materialism
Adam Schaff and “the radical conventionalism” of Ajdukiewicz
Blow against the foundation of the Lvov-Warsaw School
Władysław Tatarkiewicz and his History of Philosophy
The right for a “supervised” response
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.